Author Topic: Near infrared photograph (Read 2536 times)

Tim · « **on:** October 30, 2008, 01:34:16 PM »

The reason you're stil seeing color is that the infraredfilter i used still allows some normal light to hit the camera's sensor. Picture was taken on the seaside in Holland.

Nikon D70s + Hoya Infrared filter, 20 mm Nikkor lens

Tell me what you think.

---
Edit:

I converted this one to black & white in Adobe Lightroom. I'm less pleased on how this one turned out, but it's still one of the better shots from that day.

Some strange bushes i came across:

Bixel · « **Reply #1 on:** October 30, 2008, 01:48:57 PM »

make skin with this

i think its awesome gj tim

KillaMarci · « **Reply #2 on:** October 30, 2008, 02:04:08 PM »

Resolution is too low Otherwise it looks freaking awesome!

Tim · « **Reply #3 on:** October 30, 2008, 02:27:44 PM »

Quote from: KillaMarci

Resolution is too low Otherwise it looks freaking awesome!

I didnt want to put the 8 mb raw file on here

If you're referring to the slight 'unsharpness' of the picture, that's because a very slow shutterspeed (2 sec) is needed to get enough light through. And although the camera wasn't moving (on a tripod) the grass was moving.

Thanks for the comment

GI JOE · « **Reply #4 on:** October 30, 2008, 03:00:37 PM »

Tim i mean wow,thats impressive

please post more stuff!!!!

Tim · « **Reply #5 on:** October 30, 2008, 03:06:53 PM »

Quote from: GI JOE

Tim i mean wow,thats impressive

please post more stuff!!!!

Thanks, I might just do that.

Edit: I've added some new shots to the first post.

RedX · « **Reply #6 on:** October 30, 2008, 03:32:01 PM »

Holy shit I'm in love with the 2nd picture!

Cody · « **Reply #7 on:** October 30, 2008, 03:54:33 PM »

Very nicely done.

VenomX · « **Reply #8 on:** October 30, 2008, 05:08:34 PM »

First photo is amazing, I'm guessing that was a fairly long 3 sec + shutter speed? Love the way some of the bushy stuff is blurred, makes it look really professional (Y).

Emperatris · « **Reply #9 on:** October 30, 2008, 08:08:58 PM »

The 2nd pic is awesome!

torekk · « **Reply #10 on:** October 30, 2008, 08:59:23 PM »

Any chance to get the third picture in 1900x1020? I'd like to make a wallpaper out of it, and 1900x1020 is a good 16:10 resolution.

Tim · « **Reply #11 on:** October 31, 2008, 01:38:21 AM »

Check my post on the second page for the pics you requested

WaRoW · « **Reply #12 on:** October 31, 2008, 01:52:28 AM »

The first one is the best imo, gj

NstOne · « **Reply #13 on:** October 31, 2008, 04:11:59 AM »

Quote from: Emperatris

The 2nd pic is awesome!

x2

Boo · « **Reply #14 on:** October 31, 2008, 04:52:10 AM »

i'd like an 1900x1020 for a second picture please, its so amazing :0