Author Topic: GTASL 4 Discussion (Read 37697 times)

Kingjad · « **Reply #135 on:** April 18, 2008, 08:34:12 AM »

If anyone is unsure of their challenge, they ask. Common sense. We've already gone over this. If anyone is silly enough to submit something without making sure they understood what they were meant to achieve, it's their own fault.

Shifftee · « **Reply #136 on:** April 18, 2008, 10:34:41 AM »

Could judges vote faster?
I am going crazy to know if I win or lose.

Tackleberry · « **Reply #137 on:** April 19, 2008, 03:37:28 AM »

Many people have asked, but I haven't seen any answers.

Why doesn't fast reply work in the match threads?

Kingjad · « **Reply #138 on:** April 19, 2008, 07:13:49 AM »

When I was making up the sections I may have accidentally removed the function to do fast reply. I can rectify it later if I can be bothered to

Kingjad · « **Reply #139 on:** April 19, 2008, 07:48:00 AM »

Listen up, morons.

72 hours is what you have.

If your challenge was posted at, for example, 2:15pm on Thursday (UK time), then it'll work out like this:

24 hours: Friday 2:15pm
48 hours: Saturday 2:15pm
72 hours: SUNDAY 2:15pm.

Most people have roughly 22 hours or there abouts left to do stunts, depending on when your challenge was posted.

Mr.Magic · « **Reply #140 on:** April 20, 2008, 08:52:40 AM »

Too many matches where one, or even both, didnt do their thang.

Brulla · « **Reply #141 on:** April 20, 2008, 10:02:30 AM »

Quote from: Dannye

What about on the odd occasion where their first submission may have been done under an incorrect interpretation of the challenge? Would they then be allowed to resubmit a new stunt, or would they be forced to stick with their dud?

(Not that it matters to me, I obviously don't plan on stuffing up that badly , but I am just curious - seeing as it may happen down the line, to somebody)

Oh crap...edited the original response away, stupid me.

Yeah....don't see any problem there. Of course we have to look at the specific situation.

Quote from: SORT

Could judges vote faster?
I am going crazy to know if I win or lose.

Believe it or not, the judging is a ton of work. We have total of 180 votes to do with a lot of post editing and reading. We try to finish the judging before the next round.

Quote from: Tackleberry

Many people have asked, but I haven't seen any answers.

We are trying to answer them all. The best way is to PM us though.

Quote from: Mr.Magic

Too many matches where one, or even both, didnt do their thang.

Yeah....a lot of assholes out there.

Kingjad · « **Reply #142 on:** April 20, 2008, 10:21:04 AM »

I'm very disappointed in the no-shows, especially from guys like Feron and ZeroX who should know better by now. Saying that MOST folk seemed to have a match going for them.

morbidxxx · « **Reply #143 on:** April 20, 2008, 11:50:12 AM »

So how many points get people who won by no-shows?

Kingjad · « **Reply #144 on:** April 20, 2008, 01:21:04 PM »

4 points for the person that shows up, 0 points for the person that didn't. We're sticking with that format.

Tackleberry · « **Reply #145 on:** April 20, 2008, 01:29:43 PM »

Quote from: Kingjad

4 points for the person that shows up, 0 points for the person that didn't. We're sticking with that format.

Seriously?

Take an example, morbidxxx made a great stunt and now he only gets 4 points instead of 6, which he would've get if krow would've submit a stunt (if that would not have been even better, of course). Don't you get this system welcomes "no-shows"? If my opponent submits an awesome stunt, of course I don't want to spend a lot of time landing one and giving him 6 points, when I just could stop instead and he would only get 4 points.

I like the way the tournament is this year, but that rule is stupid imo. Sorry.

Mythic · « **Reply #146 on:** April 20, 2008, 01:35:33 PM »

I surely hope that no one is that selfish, and would give nothing, just to prevent other one from getting points. But yes, Tackleberry is right, there should be some changement to that rule.

Kingjad · « **Reply #147 on:** April 20, 2008, 01:41:46 PM »

Well, your concerns have been voiced and discussions about it will take place. However I still feel for a stunter to automatically get 6 points is a bit much, for a default win.

Tackleberry · « **Reply #148 on:** April 20, 2008, 01:56:53 PM »

Sorry for overreacting. I still stand by what I said, but maybe it's not THAT important (I hope). As long as it doesn't cause any big problems it's ok. And don't think I think you're running this the wrong way, cause I really don't.

Domovla · « **Reply #149 on:** April 20, 2008, 02:04:27 PM »

i agree with tackleberry..
now i get 4 points.. because stevex didn't post anything
and that sucks xD
i hope it wont be a problem,,