Author Topic: [SA] Flying Fucks (Read 23634 times)

Brainkiller · « **Reply #45 on:** March 16, 2008, 08:08:54 PM »

Quote from: KillaMarci

^That's because of 300FPS

He doesn't get 300fps

or atleast he doesn't with his current computer (the computer he used to land those stunts)

and Feron don't talk shit, the SA manual says

"Frame limiter on / off

Normally the frame limit of GTA: SA is 30 frames per second. This option allows the game to go faster than 30fps. Be warned that this will not magically make SA run better, but rather make your experience 'more variable'. We do not recomend you un-locking the frame rate, if you have a fast machine, it is far preferable to increase resolution, detail options, anti-aliasing, etc. rather than trying to achieve a higher frame rate by un-locking frame limiter. This will lead to a more variable game play experience"

Raskal · « **Reply #46 on:** March 16, 2008, 08:24:45 PM »

you're lucky boxxx....

PlethZorb · « **Reply #47 on:** March 16, 2008, 09:29:15 PM »

Why is that raskal!

Barney · « **Reply #48 on:** March 16, 2008, 10:01:07 PM »

I liked it man, decent music, decent editing, decent stunts.

Rok · « **Reply #49 on:** March 17, 2008, 12:13:24 AM »

waiting for toob

Genyus · « **Reply #50 on:** March 17, 2008, 12:32:29 AM »

Downloading.

Barney · « **Reply #51 on:** March 17, 2008, 02:04:38 AM »

just LQ FF stream n33b

BoBsaget · « **Reply #52 on:** March 17, 2008, 02:09:24 AM »

Wth was with the first stunt? Like Omni said that looks really imposs with such a run-up/no rads. It's a great video for a first though (apart from some old stunts)! But most of the stunts you did in that TaxXx video pwned the ones featured in this one.

WaRoW · « **Reply #53 on:** March 17, 2008, 03:05:22 AM »

sorry but i don't like it

fedex · « **Reply #54 on:** March 17, 2008, 03:17:01 AM »

Fast Review

nice vid, some stunt was great. editing was good.
where is outro?

1:42-1:48 impossible
1:50-1:54 impossible
2:31-2:40 awesome stunt
3:16-3:23 impossible
3:55-4:03 possible, I did it.
_______
8/10.

boxXx: Xvid rendering is better, and faster.

灰野敬二 · « **Reply #55 on:** March 17, 2008, 04:53:38 AM »

1st stunt : ok, is defo impossible (with 100-300+ fps) example :somebody make a map and put a building on the better runup in the front of the roof and land it from packer 2 bump, that's fucking hard with RAD man...and your runup is?? 200-300ft or less, bad you used this stunt in the vid.

I don't wanna fight so the video is enjoyable, Taz's stunt is old I think I can't see the other, some stunts are fucking kickass but some are really weak -8/10

SnowMan · « **Reply #56 on:** March 17, 2008, 05:35:45 AM »

dling

Balance · « **Reply #57 on:** March 17, 2008, 05:46:16 AM »

waitin t00b

SnowMan · « **Reply #58 on:** March 17, 2008, 05:50:29 AM »

it was ok some stunts looked really imposs to me but iÂ´m trying them later

Brainkiller · « **Reply #59 on:** March 17, 2008, 06:14:03 AM »

Quote from: GangstaG

1st stunt : ok, is defo impossible (with 100-300+ fps) example :somebody make a map and put a building on the better runup in the front of the roof and land it from packer 2 bump, that's fucking hard with RAD man...and your runup is?? 200-300ft or less, bad you used this stunt in the vid.

I don't wanna fight so the video is enjoyable, Taz's stunt is old I think I can't see the other, some stunts are fucking kickass but some are really weak -8/10

Boxxx was getting 74fps near anairport, while the camera was facing the ground.

He wouldn't have been getting anywhere near 100fps let alone 300fps -.-