GTAStunting
GTA Series => Grand Theft Auto - Vice City => VC Tutorials => Topic started by: Mr.Magic on June 01, 2008, 05:06:30 AM
-
Ay fellas! Have you ever wanted to do the missions of GTA 3 with the Vice City engine!? Well now it's possible with the "new" LC version! Get your own copy today! No more bitching over "the 3 vehicle rule"! Yaaaaaaaaay!
http://www.gtaforums.com/index.php?showtopic=268361 (http://www.gtaforums.com/index.php?showtopic=268361)
-
Great...now everyone's gonna use 3+ vehicles...
-
Great Mr.Magic
-
That still sucks, don't break 2-car-rule
-
nice
-
i did a few 3-car stunts in LC before..modded
-
ffs... just keep it to how it should be.. if we can get 3 in gta3 then its ok.. i'll look into it after IV but as far as im concerned its modding..
-
Great Mr.Magic
-
Dude you shouldnt even use 3 cars in VC, end of story!
-
nice!
-
3 cars..
-
Dude you shouldnt even use 3 cars in VC, end of story!
I thought it was possible to get 3 cars in VC?
-
Why the fuck did you have to tell people about this... P2BSM/P2CSM's are straight up repulsive...
-
Seriously if more people start doing packer to csm's and shit because of this I'll be mad at you Magic!
Edit: @ Daffy: imo mostly everything with 3 vehicles is a blooper
-
i disagree with you redx, some stunts require 3 vehicles, like a packer 2 grind 2 csm 2 grind
-
(http://www.gtastunting.net/forums/style_emoticons/default/liv.gif)
-
This fucking topic should be the deleted for the protection of our sanity...
-
Why are 3 car stunts so repulsive to you?
-
i disagree with you redx, some stunts require 3 vehicles, like a packer 2 grind 2 csm 2 grind
this is exacly what Brandon was talking about. I have no fucking idea whether that was sarcastic or not..
In case it wasn't: I disagree with that as well. If you're gonna do a switch on a grind, get on the grind naturally.
-
Why are 3 car stunts so repulsive to you?
It depends on how the 3 vehicles are used, most of the dudes here would just do P2BSM/P2CSM's with it.
But if you use it for something that can't be done without 3 vehicles, i'm gonna be ego and mention my packer2grind2boatlanding in Opposide since i can't think of any other stunts at this very moment.
-
Taz's p2b in Schism (yes that's an SA vid) for example needed a packer to extend his runup, if that's the case why people want to use 3 vehicles, then it's fine with me.
-
using 3 vehicleS = being uncreative
-
Taz's p2b in Schism (yes that's an SA vid) for example needed a packer to extend his runup, if that's the case why people want to use 3 vehicles, then it's fine with me.
but wadafug did it with just 2 vehicles in his solo. i think anything with 3 or more vehicles should be considered modding, cuz most of em are just plain unecessary.
-
Whats the 2 vehicle rule and the 3 vehicle rule?
-
using 3 vehicleS = being uncreative
Or being more creative? Perhapse it's run-up that makes creative stunts creative, and not massive.
-
Run up isnt a big part of the stunts. Makes more sense lying weight in the stunt instead of the runup.
-
Run up isnt a big part of the stunts. Makes more sense lying weight in the stunt instead of the runup.
wtf? I cant do a 170ft p2b with 40ft run-up
-
I mean, it aint a big deal in a creative stunt. Hitting right and hitting and landing the grind is a bigger deal
-
maybe, sometimes is it nice to have some run-up
-
Ahh yeah, just look at Luky's runup at his tankbump in Fracture. That runup is ehhh..
-
It was a Caddybump
-
-
[youtube]5VbzEqXaThY[/youtube]
-
It was a Caddybump
I'm sorry, Sir.