GTAStunting
General => General Discussion => Expression Section => Topic started by: brandon6199 on March 20, 2007, 09:42:35 PM
-
Well, 7 more days till my graphics card gets here so I can actually USE my other PC (don't ask, long story), so I thought I'd whip up a little something. Now I dont have Photoshop on this PC, so dont critizize me.
-
It looks like something that could be sold for $800 in an art museum. Good job I guess.
-
Thanks
-
not enough composition, basic colors, and a real artist doesnt use a ruler...
Fraser would laugh in your face
-
Any defining concept behind it or are you just trying to be "deep" looking and "in the scene"
-
i kept in mind it's an abstract art and i came to conclusion: it sucks hard.
-
i cannot think of a reason to like it suchlike, cannot force myself to like it.. but its based on my opinion,im not saying that in a bad manner..
-
We did that in year 2 on paint. AND they looked better .
-
Yeah man, not much thought went into this..
-
And how long did this take you ?
-
It's...different?
-
Well...I can't see anything special about it except for the fact that it was done in MS Paint.
Well I guess it's ok since you used Paint, also there is no depth, composition or definition in the piece itself and it fails to maintain an attainable level of being called a work of art. But I guess it's how you look at it. Good job.
-
he is joking about it... i hope
-
It'd be pretty darn sad if it weren't one
-
Well lol, what I find funny is that some artists throw paint onto a canvas (kinda like what I did) and they sell them for like $1000, what gives?
Anyone wanna buy it?
-
Well lol, what I find funny is that some artists throw paint onto a canvas (kinda like what I did) and they sell them for like $1000, what gives?
Anyone wanna buy it?
Only a few people have literally thrown paint on a canvas and got paid, and that was because it WAS original. Hell, someone even left the canvas blank and it sold for 10k or something stupid, but now it's been done, the same effect would just be laughed at.
Think of something original
-
Yea i totally agree with Aries, thats how bansky gets all his money.
-
-
Brought down by your own stupidity, eh?
-
looks like you did it in MS Paint.
-
^I did, dont have PS on this computer
-
well its unique ...
-
Jackson Pollock's, "No. 5, 1948" is the most expensive art work to date, selling for $140 million, on November 2, 2006 from David Geffen, who owns part of Dreamworks SKG.
Oddly enough it's just paint splattered, *ahem* dripped everywhere, and most of his works he did while on some drug, of which I forget.
No. 5, 1984 looks like this.
(http://img401.imageshack.us/img401/2770/02dripca0190iz6.jpg)
Fun Fact.
-
i like that painting Payton, it looks sweet
oh boy oh boy 2 weeks till i can show everyone my art class stuff
-
Nice job dude. Delete all the black lines, that's a lot better.
-
Nice job dude. Delete all the black lines, that's a lot better.
Maybe you should try to read the post next time.
</bitchmode>
-
brandon, that looks not so bad..
So good work mate.
-
art is retarded for the reasons payton and aries pointed out
-
Well lol, what I find funny is that some artists throw paint onto a canvas (kinda like what I did) and they sell them for like $1000, what gives?
Anyone wanna buy it?
Only a few people have literally thrown paint on a canvas and got paid, and that was because it WAS original. Hell, someone even left the canvas blank and it sold for 10k or something stupid, but now it's been done, the same effect would just be laughed at.
Think of something original
That's retarded. What about that one really famous painting that is like...just a couple lines. That isn't original at all...it's just retarded looking. Something like that shouldn't be sold for more than $10. I will find a picture if I come across one.
-
Jackson Pollock's, "No. 5, 1948" is the most expensive art work to date, selling for $140 million, on November 2, 2006 from David Geffen, who owns part of Dreamworks SKG.
Oddly enough it's just paint splattered, *ahem* dripped everywhere, and most of his works he did while on some drug, of which I forget.
No. 5, 1984 looks like this.
(http://img401.imageshack.us/img401/2770/02dripca0190iz6.jpg)
Fun Fact.
I'd pay ... a smelly dirty shitty sock i found underground while digging at the beach, for that POS.
-
Same here lol.... again, who wants to buy my wonderful piece of art?
-
its not about what the artpiece looks like, its the reason behind it.
(http://curente.artline.ro/poze/lucrari/251070965905346.jpg)
Blue III by Joan Miro'. its meaning is to remind us of the immense mystery of the universe and all its contents. (you'll see an appropriation of it done by me in a few weeks)
art can be as simple as a white canvas. it just needs a meaning.
-
Haywire you inspired me dude
im gonna unblock you lol...
-
Art's lame.
Just a bunch of elitist bastards getting excited when people do dumbass shit.
Just because you're original, doesn't mean you're good.
-
Art's lame.
Just a bunch of elitist bastards getting excited when people do dumbass shit.
Just because you're original, doesn't mean you're good.
just because you fail to understand it , is no reason to bag it out
-
old, but i saw it now.
nice one i guess.
now, try to do the exact thing again, only in a huge paper and with real colors