GTAStunting
GTA Series => Grand Theft Auto - Vice City => VC Stunting Challenges => Topic started by: Bliss on February 23, 2007, 06:25:21 AM
-
Well, i was figuring out of this was possible :
At the mission, Phenm Penx 86 or something. Lance is floating 100 feet or less above the ground.
(http://i18.tinypic.com/2w5pvee.jpg)
I was wonderng if you could airgrab on it, or do a sweet trick on it.
I just can't get the right spot to reach 80 feet. Do you think this is possible?
(http://i9.tinypic.com/4325og2.jpg)
(http://i16.tinypic.com/47b0xeb.jpg)
EDIT : Attached save file.
-
GASDGDS
-
interesting idea
-
how dare you use MY name for a challenge!?
but, cool idea
-
I think it`s possible , but i dont like stunts with missions
-
This would be awesome if landed. Upload a save file at that mission will you?
-
Looks cool . I would have tried it , if i had a savegame
-
Dannye better include a mission selector in his next MAIN.SCM
-
Attached the save file. It's in a .rar file because the uploading said i couldn't attach files like this.
-
Been trying this for a while both with and without Lance in the air. Dunno if it's possible to get that height at this crappy spot. Although I've got one way but I don't think it's legit.
-
Still haven't found the right spot. You can't do a p2b on those walls too .
-
very hard and interesting challenge man, i think one of the greats will do it.
-
I can't do it mayne. This is probably the best setup I've tried and it sucks big time.
[attachment=3856:untitled.PNG]
I don't think this particular challenge is possible but there's probably something similar to this. Amazing idea though.
-
OMG lol, very creative Mr..
-
Wow, nice stunt idea, I never actually realised what Lance did after you hop out.
-
@ Mr.Magic. Damn . Have you came close to lance with that way? I'm trying this now
-
@ Mr.Magic. Damn . Have you came close to lance with that way? I'm trying this now
Meh Maybe if you rotate the packer enough that you can extend the run up so that you'll be starting over at the bridge leading to the first island, or even north point mall if that's necessary.
-
Got it close with a PSM
(http://i16.tinypic.com/2mi3hg6.jpg)
(http://i13.tinypic.com/33dfd49.jpg)
(http://i17.tinypic.com/2pphstz.jpg)
-
Breaking the 3 car rule is lame in my opinion, even if it's possible.
-
Heh, i dont really care about breaking that ' rule ' for this challenge. It's about the idea and HOW to even airgrab on it. But it's oke if you think it's ' lame '..
-
Got it close with a PSM
*pictures*
Nice. I couldn't get the PSM right >_<
-
Breaking the 3 car rule is lame in my opinion, even if it's possible.
you're lame in my opinion
-
Breaking the 3 car rule is lame in my opinion.
Why ?
Its just like every other stunt . And it can be done without spoosh .
-
Yeah but it looks shitty. You're mean WW.
-
Nah it CAN'T look shitty if you pull an sweet ag on the maverick lance is in . I don't see why
people hate to see stunts whitch include 3 cars.
Oh btw, isn't it Breaking the ' 2 ' car rule?
-
LoL Yea it is..
I cant load that save game WHYYYYY
-
Different main.scm Cd?
-
This is a really cool idea im no where close though lol
-
Put a packer OUTSIDE the wall,use it to gap the wall and P2B one of the studio places
-
It's hard to even land on the wall because of the short runup. I managed to move the maverick a bit with throwing packers on it . But that's probally cheating .
-
3 cars just shows how terrible you are at looking for surroundings, I put that first when looking at videos and auditions if a stunter knows how to actually make use of terrain.
-
Sorry for this bump.
@ Demonfade : That doesn't make sense. It's easy to make use of terain stunts. But the fact is if you make old stunts cause almost every single terain stunt has been done, people complain about it's old. A 3 car stunt can make multiple new stunts.
-
Demonfag never makes sence
-
The reaction is a bit late, but he's quite right, IMO.
-
It DOES make sense. It just shows that your creativity is terrible to find natural terrain stunts to the level that you need to use a packer or second vehicle.
I use them though, but I try to make my stunts really creative
But breaking the fucking 2 car rule is fucking lame. VERY lame. I for one hate breaking it aside if you are going to enhance a stunt somehow, but not to aid you to make the stunt easier.
Terrain stunting forever
-
Breaking the 3 car rule is lame in my opinion, even if it's possible.
I don't care about the three car rule personally. That would be awesome!
-
Breaking the 2 car rule is lame. But in this case, I think it would be cool. Since the mission allows it, its 100% legit. And it wouldent look all gay like the pbsm and shit.
-
No, it isn't. You can't play 2 missions at once. Therfore, you can only use 2 vehicles for this stunt or else it will be impossible with the unmodified game. Which sucks.
-
No, it isn't. You can't play 2 missions at once.
What the hell are you talking about?
-
You need to do another mission , to break the 2 car rule @ Bliss .
-
Kenny remember when you were bitching at me because I used a packer as a 3rd vehicle in BBB because I didn't feel like playing 3/4 of the game just to unlock a gate when I could simply press like 5 buttons and spoosh a packer there
This is a cool stunt...pitty about the area and the restriction of run up and possibilities...isn't there anywhere else (another spot) you could jump out of the heli at and possilbly do this stunt?
-
bitching about 2(3) cars rule is lame. it gives more possibilities in stunting. you say about natural stunts, but you compare oranges and apples. with the same logic i can say that p2bs are gay because there are natural bumps but in fact like 90% of p2bs can't be done as a natural bump without a packer. so that's really stupid.
-
bitching about 2(3) cars rule is lame. it gives more possibilities in stunting. you say about natural stunts, but you compare oranges and apples. with the same logic i can say that p2bs are gay because there are natural bumps but in fact like 90% of p2bs can't be done as a natural bump without a packer. so that's really stupid.
Word, it's in the game, and it's possible, it's like saying also that a BSM is lame because it is a glitch, it's a very cool glitch, just like 3 car rule (if you can really count that as a glitch) they both open up many possibilities, and IMO show you can be more creative by using 3 cars to effect.
-
bitching about 2(3) cars rule is lame. it gives more possibilities in stunting.
This is a cool stunt...pitty about the area and the restriction of run up and possibilities...isn't there anywhere else (another spot) you could jump out of the heli at and possilbly do this stunt?
I dont think so, i tried to push the heli a bit more to the left but Lance flies at his spot again.
-
bitching about 2(3) cars rule is lame. it gives more possibilities in stunting. you say about natural stunts, but you compare oranges and apples. with the same logic i can say that p2bs are gay because there are natural bumps but in fact like 90% of p2bs can't be done as a natural bump without a packer. so that's really stupid.
Uhh.. you don't get my point. For this stunt, you need to do the mission. But for you to get 3 vehicles, you need to do another mission, and you can't do 2 missions at the same time so it would make this stunt impossible on a clean game. No the logic is not the same. You can't be in 2 places at once.
As for BK, that stunt can be done without the use of another vehicle.
-
bitching about 2(3) cars rule is lame. it gives more possibilities in stunting. you say about natural stunts, but you compare oranges and apples. with the same logic i can say that p2bs are gay because there are natural bumps but in fact like 90% of p2bs can't be done as a natural bump without a packer. so that's really stupid.
Uhh.. you don't get my point. For this stunt, you need to do the mission. But for you to get 3 vehicles, you need to do another mission, and you can't do 2 missions at the same time so it would make this stunt impossible on a clean game. No the logic is not the same. You can't be in 2 places at once.
As for BK, that stunt can be done without the use of another vehicle.
i'm not talking about this certain challenge. i'm talking about people bitching about overusing vehicles in general.
-
Thanks for stating the obvious Kenny I fucking said if i wanted to land it with 2 vehicles i would have to play 3/4 of the way through the game to fucking open the dam game...fucking hell.
-
Thanks for stating the obvious Kenny I fucking said if i wanted to land it with 2 vehicles i would have to play 3/4 of the way through the game to fucking open the dam game...fucking hell.
You seem angry over a bunch of binary codes.