Author Topic: Loser Round 4: Daffy vs. Dan  (Read 9328 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Genyus

  • Veteran Member
  • Posts: 6149
    • View Profile
Loser Round 4: Daffy vs. Dan
« Reply #45 on: May 27, 2008, 01:07:51 PM »
The stunt was landed in the time limit, and it's about stunting not posting right?

Offline Crazy

  • Veteran Member
  • Posts: 3053
  • boc
    • View Profile
Loser Round 4: Daffy vs. Dan
« Reply #46 on: May 27, 2008, 01:09:03 PM »
It's about both. You couldn't see the stunt if it wouldn't be posted. Another example would be someone posting a stunt a year after the match saying that he landed it in time and so on and on...as I said, it's about both - stunting and posting the entry in time.
« Last Edit: May 27, 2008, 01:12:20 PM by Crazy »

Offline Dan

  • Veteran Member
  • Posts: 2095
    • View Profile
Loser Round 4: Daffy vs. Dan
« Reply #47 on: May 27, 2008, 01:09:39 PM »
Ok, Congrats Daffy

Offline Genyus

  • Veteran Member
  • Posts: 6149
    • View Profile
Loser Round 4: Daffy vs. Dan
« Reply #48 on: May 27, 2008, 01:16:42 PM »
Sad, could you still clip it Dan. Or are you keeping it private?

Offline Tackleberry

  • Veteran Member
  • Posts: 7402
    • View Profile
Loser Round 4: Daffy vs. Dan
« Reply #49 on: May 27, 2008, 01:21:11 PM »
Actually, it could be called posted in time. In the first page only whole hours were mentioned. Dan posted his after 72.21 minutes, rounded off that's 72 and not 73. It's like a math task. When decimals aren't mentioned in the task, decimals shouldn't be used in the answer.

--------------------

Offline Daffy

  • V.I.P. Member
  • Posts: 13506
  • WH & NU Founder
    • View Profile
Loser Round 4: Daffy vs. Dan
« Reply #50 on: May 27, 2008, 01:23:18 PM »
Damnit, that was evil

Thank Dan btw

Offline Dan

  • Veteran Member
  • Posts: 2095
    • View Profile
Loser Round 4: Daffy vs. Dan
« Reply #51 on: May 27, 2008, 01:28:01 PM »
My back up for those who care:

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=iAaogyHHrMg

Fag stunt really  

Offline Mythic

  • Veteran Member
  • Posts: 3695
  • WH Member
    • View Profile
Loser Round 4: Daffy vs. Dan
« Reply #52 on: May 27, 2008, 01:31:04 PM »
This would've been good match if you wouldn't be late, that's a cute one.

Offline WaDaFuG

  • Posts: 1073
    • View Profile
    • http://gtastunting.net
Loser Round 4: Daffy vs. Dan
« Reply #53 on: May 27, 2008, 05:34:03 PM »
O damn, can't believe he landed it

Congrats Daffy

Offline Turtle Dick

  • Veteran Member
  • Posts: 8607
    • View Profile
Loser Round 4: Daffy vs. Dan
« Reply #54 on: May 27, 2008, 05:38:46 PM »
We've accepted entries that were posted slightly past the deadline before... But looks like it doesn't matter anyway, congrats Daff

Offline FTO

  • Veteran Member
  • Posts: 3128
  • I've quitted.
    • View Profile
    • FACEBOOK
Loser Round 4: Daffy vs. Dan
« Reply #55 on: May 28, 2008, 02:54:07 AM »
lol dan

lame landing daffy

Offline Rok

  • 919
  • Veteran Member
  • Posts: 1576
    • View Profile
Loser Round 4: Daffy vs. Dan
« Reply #56 on: May 28, 2008, 03:11:20 AM »
This would have been a close match if Dan submitted his stunt in time

Offline Dejv

  • Posts: 1204
  • Beyond The Art
    • View Profile
Loser Round 4: Daffy vs. Dan
« Reply #57 on: May 28, 2008, 04:47:33 AM »
Quote from: Rok Zombie
This would have been a close match if Dan submitted his stunt in time
2x
Cg Daffy

Offline Dan

  • Veteran Member
  • Posts: 2095
    • View Profile
Loser Round 4: Daffy vs. Dan
« Reply #58 on: May 28, 2008, 06:23:47 AM »
Quote from: Turtle Dick
We've accepted entries that were posted slightly past the deadline before... But looks like it doesn't matter anyway, congrats Daff

Well that sucks you have made an exception with this match, daffy said he didnt want the rules changed but you have allowed it before, dont really see how thats fair at all

Offline Turtle Dick

  • Veteran Member
  • Posts: 8607
    • View Profile
Loser Round 4: Daffy vs. Dan
« Reply #59 on: May 28, 2008, 06:58:10 AM »
I didn't change anything, but when I came in this topic both you and Daffy seemed to have settled everything already  so I assumed both of you agreed with letting Daffy win. But honestly I see no reason to decline your entry as we've already done that in the past.

But Daffy would get my vote anyway. Dan's obviously was a total fluke
« Last Edit: May 28, 2008, 07:17:55 AM by Turtle Dick »

 

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2024, SimplePortal