GTAStunting

GTAStunting Leagues => GTAStunting League - San Andreas => SASL 2014 => Topic started by: Nikedj on September 26, 2014, 07:16:49 AM

Title: Losers Round 5 - Chiler vs Named
Post by: Nikedj on September 26, 2014, 07:16:49 AM
Losers Round 5 - Match BG
Chiler vs Named

Objective Do the best car stunt involving stairs.
Deadline- 48 hours from this post
Rules (http://www.gtastunting.net/index.php?topic=66477.0)(click)
Good luck!
Title: Re: Losers Round 5 - Chiler vs Named
Post by: chiler on September 26, 2014, 11:25:53 AM
Good luck :)
Title: Re: Losers Round 5 - Chiler vs Named
Post by: JL on September 26, 2014, 12:19:33 PM
chill mal boy
Title: Re: Losers Round 5 - Chiler vs Named
Post by: chiler on September 28, 2014, 06:42:31 AM
just to not no show  https://www.sendspace.com/file/ozsu6u (https://www.sendspace.com/file/ozsu6u)
E: win  :cheersad: :a-cheer:
Title: Re: Losers Round 5 - Chiler vs Named
Post by: Named on September 28, 2014, 08:19:25 AM
just to not no show  https://www.sendspace.com/file/ozsu6u (https://www.sendspace.com/file/ozsu6u)
E: win  :cheersad: :a-cheer:

I don't thi so, you posted after 11:16 (the deadline), so you and me we have already lost the time :)

Edit: I could not land my main spot, was trying for all the weekend and got no time, so this is the replay of the main spot and the shit stunt for no show, hope you guys accept or not, thanks.

http://www.sendspace.com/filegroup/fjJq0f9PqxoxOVhmuu0zlg (http://www.sendspace.com/filegroup/fjJq0f9PqxoxOVhmuu0zlg)
Title: Re: Losers Round 5 - Chiler vs Named
Post by: Named on September 28, 2014, 08:30:28 AM
And sorry for double post but, your stunt was really close of mine entry vs Diaz, I did a combo2grind in the same spot of yours, and you did nothing in that, just dropped on the bugged vehicles, if somebody can edit and upload both mine replays to explain i will be great, thanks.
Title: Re: Losers Round 5 - Chiler vs Named
Post by: chiler on September 28, 2014, 09:06:33 AM
I posted my rep at 6:42 and edited at 7:29 cause the deadline ran out.
And iMDed the bugged car on the parking lot
And btw i didnt saw your entry vs diaz
Title: Re: Losers Round 5 - Chiler vs Named
Post by: JL on September 28, 2014, 09:11:28 AM
thats actually a no-show win, yeah  :lol:

i wonder who'd win normally though. because both entries are kinda... not really stunts
Title: Re: Losers Round 5 - Chiler vs Named
Post by: Named on September 28, 2014, 10:58:50 AM
I posted my rep at 6:42 and edited at 7:29 cause the deadline ran out.
And iMDed the bugged car on the parking lot
And btw i didnt saw your entry vs diaz

No problem dude, I don't want to start a fight here, we both got not enough time and both posted after the deadline,we must have to wait the judges decisions about to accept or not our stunts, I only said that your stunt was too simple and don't have a real objective, my entry vs streem or diaz was at the same spot like your, and was already old by Killamarci i guess, anyway lets wait the judges decisions, we both want to stay in the competition :)
Title: Re: Losers Round 5 - Chiler vs Named
Post by: JL on September 28, 2014, 11:12:16 AM
he didnt post after the deadline mate. he just edited his post after the deadline. theres two different timestamps in his post, look closer ;)
Title: Re: Losers Round 5 - Chiler vs Named
Post by: Nikedj on September 28, 2014, 11:31:43 AM
he didnt post after the deadline mate. he just edited his post after the deadline. theres two different timestamps in his post, look closer ;)
Correct  :euro: , can someone clip the replays , so judges can start voting ?  :cc_detective:
Title: Re: Losers Round 5 - Chiler vs Named
Post by: chiler on September 28, 2014, 11:52:47 AM
When someone records mine pls hold in mind that i wanted to get the mded car to land on the parkinglot
Title: Re: Losers Round 5 - Chiler vs Named
Post by: JL on September 28, 2014, 11:54:50 AM
there shouldnt be any voting at all actually. either let chiler win by no-show or, even better, grant some extension so both can actually land some proper stunts...
Title: Re: Losers Round 5 - Chiler vs Named
Post by: Named on September 28, 2014, 02:23:30 PM
there shouldnt be any voting at all actually. either let chiler win by no-show or, even better, grant some extension so both can actually land some proper stunts...

Why are you talking like this in my match with Chiller, you just don't know what really hp, he only posted that he landed the stunt like 'i landed my stunt, rep incoming' and AFTER the deadline like me he posted his replay, so don't start posting things that you don't know, this match my match with Chiller dude, lets the judges vote and stop posting
Title: Re: Losers Round 5 - Chiler vs Named
Post by: mistakeys on September 28, 2014, 03:21:51 PM
named's entry
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_OvjFVdgdlM&feature=youtu.be (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_OvjFVdgdlM&feature=youtu.be)
Title: Re: Losers Round 5 - Chiler vs Named
Post by: chiler on September 28, 2014, 09:34:41 PM
there shouldnt be any voting at all actually. either let chiler win by no-show or, even better, grant some extension so both can actually land some proper stunts...

Why are you talking like this in my match with Chiller, you just don't know what really hp, he only posted that he landed the stunt like 'i landed my stunt, rep incoming' and AFTER the deadline like me he posted his replay, so don't start posting things that you don't know, this match my match with Chiller dude, lets the judges vote and stop posting
No still not. The deadline was at 7:16 and i still posted my rep at 6:42
Title: Re: Losers Round 5 - Chiler vs Named
Post by: STREEM on September 28, 2014, 10:31:37 PM
there shouldnt be any voting at all actually. either let chiler win by no-show or, even better, grant some extension so both can actually land some proper stunts...


Why are you talking like this in my match with Chiller, you just don't know what really hp, he only posted that he landed the stunt like 'i landed my stunt, rep incoming' and AFTER the deadline like me he posted his replay, so don't start posting things that you don't know, this match my match with Chiller dude, lets the judges vote and stop posting
No still not. The deadline was at 7:16 and i still posted my rep at 6:42
you posted it two hours after deadline
Title: Re: Losers Round 5 - Chiler vs Named
Post by: chiler on September 28, 2014, 11:34:55 PM
Cant tell which education you have but 6 still is before 7 and nikedj posted the match at 7:16 am forum time
Title: Re: Losers Round 5 - Chiler vs Named
Post by: STREEM on September 29, 2014, 12:08:11 AM
first post September 26, 2014, 16:16:49 »

September 28, 2014, 16:29:16 by chiler »

checked wrong post at first, not 2 hours but still, how's your education
p.s. I didnt know that germany is 2hours ahead of CET

and you want to disqualify that guy just because he couldnt post his entry earlier just like you? fucking asshole
Title: Re: Losers Round 5 - Chiler vs Named
Post by: chiler on September 29, 2014, 12:19:24 AM
Show me a post where i said : i want him to get dqed ....i didtnt even mentioned that in one post but ya why not
And the 16:29 was my editing timei posted my rep on 15:42 let a mod/ admin check the history of my post to proof i didnt edit my post to post the rep.
on my post and named was in the topic before the deadline passed
Title: Re: Losers Round 5 - Chiler vs Named
Post by: Named on September 29, 2014, 04:20:00 AM
Start flaming or fighting here will change nothing about the match future, just wait the judges decisions
Title: Re: Losers Round 5 - Chiler vs Named
Post by: chiler on September 29, 2014, 04:26:17 AM
I didnt fight or flame tho. I just wanted to have the facts standing right
Title: Re: Losers Round 5 - Chiler vs Named
Post by: MxZz. on September 29, 2014, 07:12:59 AM
double no-show, that's the only result  :lol:
Title: Re: Losers Round 5 - Chiler vs Named
Post by: Diaz on September 29, 2014, 07:51:29 AM
double no-show, that's the only result  :lol:
Gotta agree, anyway the whole situation is just hiliarous because it's all about two well.. "stunts" as I've read. I would really love to see chilers entry but if it is at the same level as Named's then I'm totally pissed off  :lol: :lol: :lol:
Match of SASL  :ajaja:
Title: Re: Losers Round 5 - Chiler vs Named
Post by: chiler on September 29, 2014, 08:17:53 AM
uploading  :euro:
http://youtu.be/8P6fqrTHhsw (http://youtu.be/8P6fqrTHhsw)
Title: Re: Losers Round 5 - Chiler vs Named
Post by: UndeadX on September 29, 2014, 08:18:44 AM
How is it a double no-show when chiler posted his stunt in time?
Title: Re: Losers Round 5 - Chiler vs Named
Post by: PtRvY on September 29, 2014, 09:23:26 AM
I really feel like this round does not deserve a detailed review. Chiler's "stunt" was, well, at least reminiscent of a stunt performed by the army in Burn's Coperation. Named ramped onto an easy landing; this is just lazy thinking, or no thinking at all in my book. I'm sorry guys, I just expected something more out of this match and a relatively interesting challenge. And neither of you really utilised stairs in a remotely interesting way.

I vote for chiler.
Title: Re: Losers Round 5 - Chiler vs Named
Post by: Named on September 29, 2014, 10:43:21 AM
lol i just don't believe, this is a joke? Chiller's stunt can be considered a 'real' stunt? was like just no sense, my stunt was quite simple but got an objective, i did a prec using the match objective, but him omg
Title: Re: Losers Round 5 - Chiler vs Named
Post by: Simon on September 29, 2014, 10:46:38 AM
Voting for Named as his stunt actually involved a stair. Chilers "stunt" could easiy have been done without the stair aspect and wasn't even a stunt in my eyes. No matter how lazy Named's stunt was it still required more skill than dropping off a roof and hitting a car.

lol i just don't believe, this is a joke? Chiller's stunt can be considered a 'real' stunt? was like just no sense, my stunt was quite simple but got an objective, i did a prec using the match objective, but him omg
Chill out dude, people have their opinions. Let the judges speak their mind, whining about decisions before they are made is silly.
Title: Re: Losers Round 5 - Chiler vs Named
Post by: Named on September 29, 2014, 11:01:04 AM
Chill out dude, people have their opinions. Let the judges speak their mind, whining about decisions before they are made is silly.

Sure, was not my intention, I was just disgusted with his vote, but as you said, everyone has their opnions
Title: Re: Losers Round 5 - Chiler vs Named
Post by: PtRvY on September 29, 2014, 11:18:38 AM
lol i just don't believe, this is a joke? Chiller's stunt can be considered a 'real' stunt? was like just no sense, my stunt was quite simple but got an objective, i did a prec using the match objective, but him omg
Using the same logic, this is not a stunt:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eas67Qh1-R4&t=3m36s (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eas67Qh1-R4&t=3m36s)

Anyway, I want to make it totally clear. If I could, I wouldn't vote for any of you. I feel like he at least thought about doing something even though it ended up completely random, while you essentially drove forwards and landed on a narrowish area. That's why he got my vote. There is no real aspect of "difficulty" or "utilisation" in either stunt.

Chill out dude, people have their opinions. Let the judges speak their mind, whining about decisions before they are made is silly.

Sure, was not my intention, I was just disgusted with his vote, but as you said, everyone has their opnions

Yes. And I was disgusted at the fact that you both forced me and the other judges to make votes on such grounds on such a challenge by not putting in any effort in your entries. I understand that you got no time, but if you knew you were going to be so pressed for time and would still complain every time someone doesn't vote for you, tell me, why did you join this league? No offence, I respect you and like your stuff in general, but this behaviour is really puzzling for me.
Title: Re: Losers Round 5 - Chiler vs Named
Post by: Named on September 29, 2014, 11:48:50 AM
Yes. And I was disgusted at the fact that you both forced me and the other judges to make votes on such grounds on such a challenge by not putting in any effort in your entries. I understand that you got no time, but if you knew you were going to be so pressed for time and would still complain every time someone doesn't vote for you, tell me, why did you join this league? No offence, I respect you and like your stuff in general, but this behaviour is really puzzling for me.

I always wanted to join a SASL, as you can see my english is horrible but still believe that in the last two years I managed to improve it considerably, but before my English was wonderfully beautiful.

I work all day and study at night so i come home too late to stunt, i only have time for dinner and sleep to continue the routine, the only days i have time to be able to work on my match are on weekends.

It was never my intention to delay or disrupt the organization of the championship, i just thought your vote was very strange and unfair, that's my opnion, i fully agree that my entry was not surprising also, have you taked a look at my main stunt replay bail? I uploaded two replays, the main stunt and the backup that Mistake recorde for me.

You think i like to delay the competition and on top put something without quality? :)
Title: Re: Losers Round 5 - Chiler vs Named
Post by: PtRvY on September 29, 2014, 11:55:56 AM
I'm sorry, I cannot view reps. I do not have SA. Of course I would never expect you to want to put in stuff like this (at least compared to the stuff you normally put out) and I understand what it's like to constantly be under obligations - it's been like that for me for a while now. I'm just confused at why would you join the league if you knew it was going to be such a strain for you. And it was never my intention to be 'unfair', it's just the way I see this round. As I said during an editing league I organised a few years ago, no matter what the entries in a match are, you can always find seven people to vote for one and seven people to vote for the other - in the end, it's all down to personal preference, less or more. So you really don't need to be disgruntled, believe me I am in no way personally biased against you.
Title: Re: Losers Round 5 - Chiler vs Named
Post by: Diaz on September 29, 2014, 12:15:46 PM
C'mon guys Streem needs an opponent  :euro:
Title: Re: Losers Round 5 - Chiler vs Named
Post by: Named on September 29, 2014, 12:42:57 PM
I'm sorry, I cannot view reps. I do not have SA. Of course I would never expect you to want to put in stuff like this (at least compared to the stuff you normally put out) and I understand what it's like to constantly be under obligations - it's been like that for me for a while now. I'm just confused at why would you join the league if you knew it was going to be such a strain for you. And it was never my intention to be 'unfair', it's just the way I see this round. As I said during an editing league I organised a few years ago, no matter what the entries in a match are, you can always find seven people to vote for one and seven people to vote for the other - in the end, it's all down to personal preference, less or more. So you really don't need to be disgruntled, believe me I am in no way personally biased against you.

I understand and respect you, we love to stunt, no matter if you have a lot of time or not time enough, that's why im in :ajaja:
Title: Re: Losers Round 5 - Chiler vs Named
Post by: tomiboy on September 29, 2014, 01:07:17 PM
sorry, guys, i'm kinda disappointed of both of your stunts, so i'm konna keep it short. chiler's stunt could've been done, too, if he just started from the roof. also, it was a really random one in my eyes. the stairs in named's stunt were at least relevant for the actual stunt. voting for named .
Title: Re: Losers Round 5 - Chiler vs Named
Post by: bLADE on September 30, 2014, 02:16:10 PM
Named.
Title: Re: Losers Round 5 - Chiler vs Named
Post by: Shifftee on October 02, 2014, 01:32:05 PM
Obviously Named. :ajaja:
SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2024, SimplePortal