GTAStunting
GTA Series => Grand Theft Auto - San Andreas => SA World Records => Topic started by: VaNilla on July 26, 2011, 10:29:31 PM
-
Holy fuck :lol:, I was just messing around in SA randomly trying to land the Watch This opener with FL off after changing my ENB settings, but I accidentally broke the world record height by an incredible new milestone of 3ft! Amazing.
Shadowsniper's NRG Height World Record (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D8WUC49u1rU#ws)
Replay Link (includes picture of insane stunt bonus) (http://www.sendspace.com/file/yn15dc)
-
wow you totally owned that spot :P
-
holy shit ._. owned :ajaja:
-
wait whaaat, this just cant be :o :o :o :o, oh well
-
oh my lord :lol:
thats fucking huge :lol:
-
:blink:
-
Can't really imagine that height off that spot as people barely land the roof. Your RADs wasn't perfectly smooth plus the slight curve before the bump slows you a tad, so you ain't having maximum speed at all. I guess I'll have a look on the replay when I'm home.
And didn't you have 240ft before anyway? :cc_detective:
GTA:SA 240ft height record modded (Shadowsniper) (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p6NEv-Tk9ss#)
-
Can't really imagine that height off that spot as people barely land the roof. Your RADs wasn't perfectly smooth plus the slight curve before the bump slows you a tad, so you ain't having maximum speed at all. I guess I'll have a look on the replay when I'm home.
And didn't you have 240ft before anyway? :cc_detective:
GTA:SA 240ft height record modded (Shadowsniper) (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p6NEv-Tk9ss#)
lol i thought the same. But i was expecting it to be like 270ft :P
-
Rusch do you think I imagined I'd get this height? I was just trying to land the roof, I did not expect this to happen :lol:. I've talked about that other clip before, yes it's modded but honestly I'm not interested in talking about something I did when I was 12 years old 5 years afterwards ;)
-
Looks legit, gj
-
I remember a couple of years ago when flow posted a video of my 230ft record here and a lot of ppl said (including u , ss .If I remember correclty) thats not possible to get more than 223 ft height :lol:...
...well gj, Ill watch the rep later cuz I share ruschs point of view.
-
I have a clip of 230ft on the SF bridge bump on YT. Too bad I landed in the water so I had to teleport to see the ISB :cheersad: Nice height btw
-
Huuuuuuge
-
I remember a couple of years ago when flow posted a video of my 230ft record here and a lot of ppl said (including u , ss .If I remember correclty) thats not possible to get more than 223 ft height :lol:...
I won't have said that I'm pretty sure :P
-
That just looks inmense, great job Paula. The editing made me laugh somehow though :lol:
-
Wow!
Someone call Take Two, we're dealing with another foul installation of SA.
-
That just looks inmense, great job Paula. The editing made me laugh somehow though :lol:
That was the intention :ninja:
-
Looks modded as hell and I thought that only FL-ON records count?
-
Looks modded as hell and I thought that only FL-ON records count?
You're right that FL ON only counts, I only posted it because I was so shocked that it happened :P
-
Looks very modded, seems you need to reinstall your SA, it has gone corrupt once again!
-
looks modded as fuck
-
Doesn't look legit, at least not from that cam angle. Might download the replay later if I'm arsed to.
-
I won't comment on whether it's modded or not but I've had a similar where I got 222 and it looked pretty much the same with a continued boost upwards.
Anyway, cool editing.
-
nice i never get that high <_<
-
My comment was not even offensive. :lol:
The moderator who deleted it should ban himself for sucking on Paul's cock, or maybe for simply being a retard? you decide.
-
I don't know who's deleting comments but I don't mind any comments saying it's modded or whatever, I know what people are like about me so I expected no different, I don't care :P
-
What I said exactly: "only 4 negative comments of a total of 34? it's the end of days".
-
(http://chinkyu.files.wordpress.com/2010/07/kyon_facepalm.jpg)
-
I don't know who's deleting comments but I don't mind any comments saying it's modded or whatever, I know what people are like about me so I expected no different, I don't care :P
(http://cache.ohinternet.com/images/7/75/Cool_Story_Troll.jpg)
-
I know what people are like about me so I expected no different
Obviously all about you
-
If any of the accusations were about the stunt somebody would have checked my replay by now instead of resorting to failed jokes ;). Anyway, have fun debating about it, I only posted this for people who might enjoy it.
-
In that case here you go.
http://www.multiupload.com/3BWDUYSIJS (http://www.multiupload.com/3BWDUYSIJS)
You can't say I did something major wrong on that attempt as the line is pretty equal and I didn't have any road bumps at all. Your acceleration is yet still higher by 6% which is indeed extremely weird, eh? I know the speed is not 100%ly proportional to the acceleration, but you simply won't come too close to those required ~300 km/h simply because of that curve anyway. My conclusion tends to be that you've used some speed modification.
-
Good job Paul.
I don't care if it's modded or not , SA is full of shit anyways.
-
That only applies if you both had vsync on Rusch, rep speeds are different if your fps were different.
So please explain why are you an 'official SA section mod spotter' again?
-
Not to mention the small mistakes from your video... if you stop the vid in the beginning I can see you let SS start with 2 metres ahead of you. Not that it matters that much, but hey, it's not fair.
You're obviously trying to make people lose respect for this guy, not that he has any. :lol:
-
Baseline, go suck a dick, unfunny fuck. You're trying way too hard to beat SS at trolling and it's getting fucking annoying. See you in a while.
also SS keep in mind about what I said regarding your stay here. I won't hesitate when the moment's there.
-
Rusch, for one my replay is simply faster than yours, so I don't know how you can judge my acceleration based on that, some people even have incredibly slow replays too, that's just how FL off works. Also we will have been running at different levels of FPS (mine was about 100-120 for reference). Secondly I didn't actually run into any road bumps at all, what you're seeing is when I went in and out of my RAD to avoid them. I don't know what you're talking about with the curve in front of the bump, but all I did was rad over it and go out of my RAD just before the bump. I don't think I slowed down but I don't use speedometers so I wouldn't know. No offense but you're talking out of your arse man :P, if you'd asked me whether I thought this height was possible from this bump I'd be skeptical because I'd never seen it done until now, but in the same way the first time I seen 223ft off the LS airport bump I was skeptical. I was shocked when I got this height, hence why I posted the video.
And Puzzle, I haven't done anything wrong so far and I think you know it, that month ban was completely unjustified, and based on my conversations with some other staff members it seems they agree with me. But I'm not going to bait your banhammer, at this point I'm only going to post in this topic again if asked to respond to 'proof' like Rusch's again :P
-
Looking at it rationally, why would SS post a landing of an old spot as a world record that doesn't even count (the fl:on rule)? I'm not master at spotting mods, and sure, I see this stunt as modded, 'cause it just looks like that for me, but I can't find any rational reason why'd SS post a modded stunt here, now, if it's unmodded, the rational reason is sheer surprise & unbelief from oneself, that he wants to share with us. So, even if it looks modded to me, I still think it's clean.
-
baseline should eat some tea and biscuits and watch anime and never come back :a-cheer:
-
World Record THERE? :| Nice job!
-
Actually the replay speed doesn't really matter on here. I also mentioned that the line wasn't toally equal and I simply picked the first frame of the runups where the bike moved forward, but Baseline that's not a major thing at all.
The thing is that you won't have the required speed for such a high bump. Take ~270 km/h as reference (with extended runup) at that crossroad. That little curve between the croassroad and the bush will make you lose a little speed so you probably will bump with ~265 km/h or so. On the airport you can hit the bump with almost 300 km/h and yet still 'only' get 223 ft height? Okay, let's even assume the replays have different speeds - SS still must've gained around 300 km/h to get the height and he did have 2 road bumps there (at 0:03 & 0:07). Perhaps SS' acceleration was altered that he gained enough speed to gain that height - guess why I compared the speeds. To see if my assumption could be true.
I simply don't see a slightly higher bump happen when the speed at the bump was lower. Would wanna know with how much speed you use to hit that bush :P
-
The replay speed really does matter, you tried to match up our replays when they run at different rates, it's ridiculous :P. I don't know what speed is required for a bump like that and I don't pretend to either, all I know is that I got an incredibly powerful bump off that bush and it surprised the fuck out of me :P. You can't really compare the height you can get from these bumps either, one is much taller than the other, so you have more surface area to collide with.
-
And you call me a modder I feel so delightfull right now
-
Some time ago I tried that stunt just for fun too but I even didn't use half of the runup and edged it.
So the speed of the stunt didn't match with the bump hight and of course it looked modded.
This bump is weird so everything could happen there.
Don't trying to protect ss, just telling what happend to me!
-
Looks modded as hell and I thought that only FL-ON records count?
That's bullshit, the 223ft one is FL:OFF too.
-
i dont think that was modded, GJ
-
Both bumps are pretty intense, but if you put it that way... 3 feet aren't a big difference eh? Technically it's simply just way too unlikely to get that height there as you defo hadn't the required speed. If youre so damn hooked on the replay speed thing then nevermind that one, so shall I map the bush thing to the LS airport and see if you can get 240 ft again? :lol:
-
How the hell would you know if I had the required speed? You haven't tested the bump at different speeds and seen what you get on average, or accounted for the fact that I clearly got the 'perfect bump' off this. As for your point about both bumps being intense, you don't seem to understand the difference the size of an object makes to the bump. For example, tell me how easy it is to get something like 190ft off the SF bridge bump? In case you don't know, you can practically get that every couple of tries. Now although you can get 223ft off the LS airport bump, you can't possibly be trying to tell me you can consistently get height like this off that object, because it generally give you more distance due to it's medium level size (hence my point about the 'perfect bump', nobody would have said you could get this height from that bump until someone actually landed it). The SF bridge bump has almost the same amount of runup as this bush bump (disregarding road bumps), and the bush is larger in height so you can get more vertical from it. It doesn't take a genius to see that you're full of shit man :P
So please explain why are you an 'official SA section mod spotter' again?
I never actually expected to agree with Baseline about something but this is the truth. You and MMM have done fuck all against the actual modding in the SA Unmodded Section, and here you are trying to blind me with bullshit. Please leave me alone :P
-
You mad? There's no need to start insulting :lol:
How the hell would you know if I had the required speed?
It's technically way too unlikely to gain around 290 km/h on the spot due to that curve as I said couple times before, specially not with road bumps. Acceleration won't stay up while you turn the curve, you even lose speed. The 'more vertical' bumping object won't make it up for it that much.
As for your point about both bumps being intense, you don't seem to understand the difference the size of an object makes to the bump.
Duh... I know bumps are different. The different bumps just tend to rather give you either distance or height. The LS airport and SF bridge one both can give intense heights and distances.
For example, tell me how easy it is to get something like 190ft off the SF bridge bump? In case you don't know, you can practically get that every couple of tries.
The object just tends to give you rather some height, landing the naval base with 600+ feet distance can also happen as you are able to reach 290 km/h there. There the required speed is available. Off that one those ~220 ft height are possible aswell.
The SF bridge bump has almost the same amount of runup as this bush bump (disregarding road bumps), and the bush is larger in height so you can get more vertical from it.
These are the distances from the starts to the bumps
SF bridge bump - ~1900 ft
LS airport bump - ~2250 ft
LS bush bump - 2100ft
Do the SF bridge or the LS airport ones have 3 curves and like 6 road bumps? No, they're plain straight so you can reach those ~300 km/h with some constant acceleration. It's technically not going to happen that you reach the required speed on the bush bump because of that curve and as I said, the object won't make it up that much when you'll only bump at like 265 km/h.
You and MMM have done fuck all against the actual modding in the SA Unmodded Section, and here you are trying to blind me with bullshit.
Sadly I am not a moderator of that section. I actually would've made some moves in case. MMM is not really active these days, so all I can do currently is reporting stuff to him. Mostly I only speak up when I'm sure about modding related stuff. Just like on here - fact is that you won't get the required speed there.
-
How the hell would you know if I had the required speed?
It's technically way too unlikely to gain around 290 km/h on the spot due to that curve as I said couple times before, specially not with road bumps. Acceleration won't stay up while you turn the curve, you even lose speed. The 'more vertical' bumping object won't make it up for it that much.
Why do you need 290km/h? I don't know whether I reached that level of speed or not, I don't even know the max speed of an NRG since I don't use speedometers, but you can't say you need that exact amount of speed to reach 226ft, if you've never landed it yourself you couldn't possibly know. Even I don't know, I'm sure it's possible with less speed than I had frankly.
For example, tell me how easy it is to get something like 190ft off the SF bridge bump? In case you don't know, you can practically get that every couple of tries.
The object just tends to give you rather some height, landing the naval base with 600+ feet distance can also happen as you are able to reach 290 km/h there. There the required speed is available. Off that one those ~220 ft height are possible aswell.
Would you agree that you rarely get the distance required to meet the naval base from that bump? That on average you just get lots of height? This is why I'm talking about the concept of getting the 'perfect bump'. Before this bump the maximum I'd had off that bush bump was something like 170ft, that's why I was so shocked that I landed the roof with that much height. I can understand your skepticism because of that, but saying I used speed mods is a load of bullshit, just look at my replay, when you take into account the different replay speed's I will have had around the same speed as you despite a little curb bump at the start (keep in mind the FPS difference between us as well).
Do the SF bridge or the LS airport ones have 3 curves and like 6 road bumps? No, they're plain straight so you can reach those ~300 km/h with some constant acceleration. It's technically not going to happen that you reach the required speed on the bush bump because of that curve and as I said, the object won't make it up that much when you'll only bump at like 265 km/h.
The curves on the road don't matter much at all as long as you drive through them relatively straight like I did so you can keep leaning forward. As for the roadbumps, I hit a little one at the very start of my runup, and after that I hit none of them (which clearly barely affected my speed), I always avoided them by going in and out of my RAD.
Mostly I only speak up when I'm sure about modding related stuff. Just like on here - fact is that you won't get the required speed there.
The fact is you are wrong. The whole notion that I modded this is just retarded, seriously. I was in SA modifying my ENB settings (the settings you see used on my clip) and once I finished them I decided I'd try this stunt for fun, with FL off. As you know, I don't use FL off stunts in any of my videos, I only use FL on, but I do find it fun to do certain stunts with FL off now and then. So right off the bat I never had any reason to actually use this stunt. However, because I got this bump and PRECISELY because I was shocked that it was so high, I posted it. How could I have pre-determined this would happen and decide to use speedmods just so I could make this video? You ask me if I'm mad, no I'm not but I think you'd be pretty pissed off if every time you post a high stunt all you get is senseless debate about it ;)
-
Wow. this discussion is ridiculous... are we going all math on like the most inconsistent game of all time?
-
Why do you need 290km/h? I don't know whether I reached that level of speed or not, I don't even know the max speed of an NRG since I don't use speedometers, but you can't say you need that exact amount of speed to reach 226ft, if you've never landed it yourself you couldn't possibly know. Even I don't know, I'm sure it's possible with less speed than I had frankly.
You simply roughly need around that speed for that height. There are only couple spots in the SA map which offer a bump at ~300 km/h and the LS bush bump isn't one of those. How do you know the curve doesn't affect it much when you don't use any speedo? You can try to pass through the curves relatively straight, but the speed won't raise as it would on a straight line. Concerning that, you won't arrive the bump with that needed speed (dude trust me, I've been using that speedo for years... try it yourself!). And you even said it yourself, your speed probably should've been around the same as mine, but we're both still way below 300 km/h.
So with your logic that bush bump simply gives more powerful bumps at an actual lower speed right (?) - so if it'd be placed on the LS airport for example where we're actually able to gain almost 300 km/h we should be able to fly even higher eh! There's no bump in SA where you get around 220 feet height with a speed like on the LS bush bump. Weirdly everyone who reached around 220 ft did it on a spot where you're indeed able to gain the required speed eh... except you once again, what a surprise! You've modded some stuff in the past and this once again is way too unlikely because of that simple speed issue. Due to the speedo you really can estimate stuff and that's way out of my range. The bumping object simply won't make it up that much.
-
Just watched the rep. Your rad wasn't the best and it looks extremely modded, there are some people who think it's clean tho, so gj(on fooling at least) i guess lol :P
-
Oh god everything was much better when ShadowSniper was not here and everything will better if Baseline was not here :cheernutz:
-
226ft is very possible with 270kmph, also this doesn't look suspicious at all to me... Nice one :cc_detective:
-
Why do you need 290km/h? I don't know whether I reached that level of speed or not, I don't even know the max speed of an NRG since I don't use speedometers, but you can't say you need that exact amount of speed to reach 226ft, if you've never landed it yourself you couldn't possibly know. Even I don't know, I'm sure it's possible with less speed than I had frankly.
You simply roughly need around that speed for that height. There are only couple spots in the SA map which offer a bump at ~300 km/h and the LS bush bump isn't one of those. How do you know the curve doesn't affect it much when you don't use any speedo? You can try to pass through the curves relatively straight, but the speed won't raise as it would on a straight line. Concerning that, you won't arrive the bump with that needed speed (dude trust me, I've been using that speedo for years... try it yourself!). And you even said it yourself, your speed probably should've been around the same as mine, but we're both still way below 300 km/h.
So with your logic that bush bump simply gives more powerful bumps at an actual lower speed right (?) - so if it'd be placed on the LS airport for example where we're actually able to gain almost 300 km/h we should be able to fly even higher eh! There's no bump in SA where you get around 220 feet height with a speed like on the LS bush bump. Weirdly everyone who reached around 220 ft did it on a spot where you're indeed able to gain the required speed eh... except you once again, what a surprise! You've modded some stuff in the past and this once again is way too unlikely because of that simple speed issue. Due to the speedo you really can estimate stuff and that's way out of my range. The bumping object simply won't make it up that much.
Of course you'd be able to get higher at LS airport, it's a better runup. As for the rest, we've talked all that bollocks to death now, all I can say is you're wrong. I never intended to try this stunt or break a world record, this was completely random and why the fuck would I use a speedmod for that? Believe what you want, this is clean and the majority of people know that.
PS. to be fair there's pretty much no bump like the bush bump either, given that you can actually bump something almost as tall as your RAD. And also, Rainbow got 230ft off the SF bridge bump (bailed) and it seems like you can get pretty much the exact same speed there as you can on the bush spot, with a bump which isn't as good for height, so don't even lie about the required speed :P
-
I like trains.
-
i dont think that was modded, GJ
-
I like trains.
w00T wOO... Shit was crazy SS.
-
Close this please!
-
No this is entertainment, why should we close this? None of the parties have come to a definite conclusion that rules the other out.
When in doubt look at Moustache Masrhall
-
I like trains.
w00T wOO... Shit was crazy SS.
Wow I haven't spoke to you since TS :P, thanks :)
-
I don't think this was modded tbh, I once got 216 ft on a spot where I didn't reach max speed either. GJ.
-
You got the runup perfectly. You got the bump perfectly. You got the height perfectly. You got the landing perfectly. You got the WR perfectly.
-
^ LOL! :lol:
Nice job SS this is as radbump or highbump? :unsure:
-
Not sure what you mean but you can do it without even leaning forward, if you want more distance. I leaned down probably a millisecond before I hit it :)
-
You got the runup perfectly. You got the bump perfectly. You got the height perfectly. You got the landing perfectly. You got the WR perfectly.
You are asslicking perfectly.
-
That was.. odd. Not sure what to think here :blink:
-
It is neither odd nor suspicious, the bump is clean unless if you lean down a little bit you can get that height as I accidentally did on an another previous test :P
-
You got the runup perfectly. You got the bump perfectly. You got the height perfectly. You got the landing perfectly. You got the WR perfectly.
You are asslicking perfectly.
XD
-
HOLY SHIT, SS POSTED A CONTREVERSIAL BUMP!!! EVERYONE TROLL HIM AND CALL HIM A MODDER!
-
HOLY SHIT, SS POSTED A CONTREVERSIAL BUMP!!! EVERYONE TROLL HIM AND CALL HIM A MODDER!
Your about uh,
lets see err
5 Pages late.
y u no love me :(
-
Great fuckin job on the spamming and pointless 1-liners. Seriously, get contributive or fuck off to another board -_-
Also this isn't a world record. If it were fl-on it'd be a world record..this is fl off..shadowsniper hates fl off..shadowsniper lands a height record and suddenly he loves fl off..shadowsniper will claim this is fl on in a few months/years..
..closed