add as jumper
I could judge if there arent enough people for that ;)
What the heck, sign me up as a stunter.
Being on this list doesn't make anyone a judge. It's just a sign-up list for people who want to be a judge.
Who actually is going to be a judge or better said; is judge-team material, will be decided later!
can i join as stunter? :euro:
Rusch, its SASL 6, SASL 5 was 2011 (i called it sasl4 tho but it got used that that was sasl5 as you can see on almost everything related to that league), SATL2 (the one with 3 guys groups system) was counted as SASL4, SASL3 was on temp forums, SATL1 was counted as SATL and SASL2 and SASL1 were 08/07.
^then explain me, why SASL5 was called SASL5 ( http://www.gtastunting.net/index.php?board=371.0 (http://www.gtastunting.net/index.php?board=371.0) ). Just lets keep it as it is.
PtRvY just can't count for shit bro, yet he studies something maths related :P
Carrying on with this mistake is stupid imo. Then there's just a gap of the SASL4 which never seemed to exist. Stunting leagues are organized irregularly, so going with the year seems just fine and makes it straight.
E: Posts of this subforum don't show up within the recent topics on the front page. You should maybe make a blog post, so people get to see that this thing is going on and sign up in time.
Stunter or judge. I just want to be a part of this. :ajaja:
Judge.Stunter or judge. I just want to be a part of this. :ajaja:
your call
^then explain me, why SASL5 was called SASL5 ( http://www.gtastunting.net/index.php?board=371.0 (http://www.gtastunting.net/index.php?board=371.0) ). Just lets keep it as it is.Quote from: Rusch69PtRvY just can't count for shit bro, yet he studies something maths related :P
He wanted to include the SATL ones to the counting, but seemed to forget about the second one. Therefore it was declared as SASL5. Staff had already created the subforum etc. and stuff was too far already to be changed, so people just had to deal with it.
Plani - Judge :)
damster - judge if possible :)
e/ how are you going to make the judged out of the "potential" ones?
damster - judge if possible :)
e/ how are you going to make the judged out of the "potential" ones?
those with most experience and the abilitly to judge objective or better said, judge in the name of the objective
and other shit
I'd love to be a judge. Will be free since August.
I'd love to be a judge. Will be free since August.
tournament will propably start earlier... is that cool too?
I'd love to be a judge. Will be free since August.
tournament will propably start earlier... is that cool too?
I will go somewhere for a 2-week trip in the middle of July..So might not be able to judge the first few rounds.
first option maybe? but we could make it like for 16 first signed up instead of randomizing it, imo that should be a gift for being one of first supporters of this league :jajaja:I can understand this opinion but for me it's seems a bit unfair, I mean I'm really sorry for not checking the forum ALL DAY LONG like a nolifer, no offense. We should find a way to do this. Or what if we wait until 64 participants? I guess it would be fine, I'm just not nearly sure we will reach that number.
This. It really isn't fair just picking out a numberfirst option maybe? but we could make it like for 16 first signed up instead of randomizing it, imo that should be a gift for being one of first supporters of this league :jajaja:I can understand this opinion but for me it's seems a bit unfair, I mean I'm really sorry for not checking the forum ALL DAY LONG like a nolifer, no offense. We should find a way to do this. Or what if we wait until 64 participants? I guess it would be fine, I'm just not nearly sure we will reach that number.
This. It really isn't fair just picking out a numberfirst option maybe? but we could make it like for 16 first signed up instead of randomizing it, imo that should be a gift for being one of first supporters of this league :jajaja:I can understand this opinion but for me it's seems a bit unfair, I mean I'm really sorry for not checking the forum ALL DAY LONG like a nolifer, no offense. We should find a way to do this. Or what if we wait until 64 participants? I guess it would be fine, I'm just not nearly sure we will reach that number.
Sign me up as a backup judge, please. Nickname same as on forums: Gesior7.
Threesomes seem more reasonable than leaving half the participants with thumbs up their asses.
@exe, tell me how to execute those elliminations for 50 participants/48 participants
Threesome is a good way to reach the top 32 I guess. Or maybe we should do that around the final, but the idea itself is cool. Or just wait for 64 participants, but I'm afraid even if we reach that people, half of them won't show anything in the first round. It would be another opportunity to start the league with 32 guys and let's see how many of them won't come up with stunt and then replace those guys. It's just unfair for the backup stunters as they have only 2 rounds to gather enough point to survive the group. And who knows who many people will noshow? Anyway I don't think a relatively fast league would be bad at all.
I'd like to be a judge, would be fun
Since I have never been in a SASL, stunter fo sho! :)
Since I have never been in a SASL, stunter fo sho! :)
You'll just land ok stuff & edit it so great that everyone will vote for you anyways cause you'll make it seem like the best thing ever. Cheater! :lol:
stunter or judge?
Man, got my finals during July 15-19 and the week after I'm on vacation till August 15...
There is no chance you're gonna put this whole thing on hold for one month, is there ?
I would like to join as stunter.Woah.
"Sign me up"woops, sign-ups are over you know :P
"Sign me up"
edit: Reading really is fundamental. I guess it's already been settled but I'm not entirely sure.