GTAStunting

General => Video Editing/Compression => General Discussion => Editing Tournament => Topic started by: PtRvY on February 24, 2012, 01:26:31 PM

Title: [ET] STANDINGS TOPIC
Post by: PtRvY on February 24, 2012, 01:26:31 PM
XTO gave me permission to make these (I offered to do it since I have experience from two previous group system tournaments), hopefully it should help with any group system related confusion you guys might have! Got all the info from him so these are not my remarks, all I did was make the GFX :P

I'll update these periodically.

Remarks:
- A no-show win is counted as 3-0.
- In the match D4rksh4doW vs. eXe, D4rksh4doW was awarded a 6-0 win because eXe didn't fulfill the challenge.
- Some matches marked as won are not actually wins yet, this is due to the fact the vote count of the leading editor is less than 4. Judges are asked to timely correct this error.
- All judges are kindly requested to make the vote count in every topic on it maximum (6), so that we have a fair base for PD (Point Difference) ranking. Two editors with the same amount of points won will be ranked using this value.

W - Wins
D - Draws
L - Losses
PD - Point Difference (Amount of votes for minus amount of votes against the editor)
Pts - Points won

San Andreas

(http://i40.tinypic.com/34ii5ur.png)

(http://i44.tinypic.com/11wbkif.png)

(http://img7.imagebanana.com/img/b66cndau/TABLESAGroup3copy.png)

(http://i42.tinypic.com/swtz6f.png)

(http://i40.tinypic.com/10gwoqo.png)

(http://i44.tinypic.com/345ehcm.png)

(http://img7.imagebanana.com/img/wlba0iln/TABLESAGroup7copy.png)

(http://img7.imagebanana.com/img/221zr987/TABLESAGroup8copy.png)

Vice City

(http://i42.tinypic.com/25jic7l.png)

(http://i44.tinypic.com/2utrqzq.png)

(http://i41.tinypic.com/23mo8s3.png)

(http://i43.tinypic.com/c2l55.png)

I hope you guys find this helpful. :)
Title: Re: [ET] STANDINGS TOPIC
Post by: XTO -- on February 24, 2012, 01:30:31 PM
Thanks for doing this Petar :wub:

Preparing round 3 stuff, they should be up in 4 and half hours or  bit more ^^
Title: Re: [ET] STANDINGS TOPIC
Post by: value on February 24, 2012, 01:44:29 PM
ich zieh die punkte wie yayo lines auf gran canaria


gj and ty for doing this stuff
Title: Re: [ET] STANDINGS TOPIC
Post by: Rainbow on February 24, 2012, 02:25:07 PM
I won from Determined in VC yet I have 0 points.. Explaination?  :cheersad:
Title: Re: [ET] STANDINGS TOPIC
Post by: XTO -- on February 24, 2012, 02:33:29 PM
There was 1 judge who didn't vote in that match. ByTe is working on it to get the maximum possible votes, sorry for that. I got to work in the vote system after the second round started, and Petar gave me some tips, so your first match, Helios first match and a couple of others may have to get their 6th vote, since it's like 3-2 nor 4-1.
Title: Re: [ET] STANDINGS TOPIC
Post by: PtRvY on February 24, 2012, 02:34:42 PM
I won from Determined in VC yet I have 0 points.. Explaination?  :cheersad:

You need 4 points in a match to win. XtO marked you as a winner by checking who had more votes but didn't see that the score was 3-2. When ByTe votes we'll know whether you've truly won or it was a tie. :P
Title: Re: [ET] STANDINGS TOPIC
Post by: Squeak on February 24, 2012, 02:45:14 PM
What is the point of making those PDs while in some matches all the judges didn't even vote at all.
Title: Re: [ET] STANDINGS TOPIC
Post by: XTO -- on February 24, 2012, 02:48:10 PM
The main issue with the previous vote system, is that there was a rather small, but existing possibility that there was a major tie in the end of the third round. But I actually started thinking about that after the beggining of the second one, after I have already declared you as the match winner. Gladly Petar told me what he have done in the previous tour to avoid that, since I haven't come up with any solutions by then, now we have it, and maybe a not really good one for a very few participants.

Even tho I believe it wouldn't happen, it's better to avoid that kind of situation


@Squeak: ByTe is voting in every match that didn't have 6 votes to make sure it's all good


Also, Rainbow, why didn't you show-up?
Title: Re: [ET] STANDINGS TOPIC
Post by: disciplo on February 24, 2012, 03:58:46 PM
so I guess that even if I win cloudwalker, it will be a meaningless victory since I won't have enough points to go for the other round? or maybe I'm misunderstanding this?
Title: Re: [ET] STANDINGS TOPIC
Post by: XTO -- on February 24, 2012, 04:00:20 PM
Top 2 will go for knockouts, not only the first place. So yes, you have a chance
Title: Re: [ET] STANDINGS TOPIC
Post by: Rainbow on February 25, 2012, 03:55:10 AM
Sign me out of this league in VC aswell. How did we freaking tie a round? An even number of judges? The challenge was best camera angles and this is how Warow voted:

Rainbow: Nice camera's.
Determined: Camera's weren't so amazing.

Voting for Determined ...

cya guys have fun in the league it's the same crap all over again.
Title: Re: [ET] STANDINGS TOPIC
Post by: Determined on February 25, 2012, 08:44:54 AM
Actually, the objective was best editing with 2 cinematic angles, there was no implication that the actual angles would play a major part.
Title: Re: [ET] STANDINGS TOPIC
Post by: Rainbow on February 26, 2012, 07:24:48 AM
Actually, the objective was best editing with 2 cinematic angles, there was no implication that the actual angles would play a major part.


Where does this say editing???


Objective: Best camera angles where you must use atleast 2 cinematic angles
Title: Re: [ET] STANDINGS TOPIC
Post by: Determined on February 26, 2012, 01:41:49 PM
Sorry, my bad, thought it said editing  :lol:
In that case, you're right.
Title: Re: [ET] STANDINGS TOPIC
Post by: PtRvY on March 01, 2012, 08:09:59 PM
Final update. Now that we know everyone who passed. :) Good that there weren't any ties, that made my job hella easier :D

I'd like to congratulate D4rksh4doW and Kacknase for their flawless scores in SA and VC :)
Title: Re: [ET] STANDINGS TOPIC
Post by: Shifftee on March 02, 2012, 07:23:35 AM
Is there any point of having my match against iAndy anymore?  :euro:
Title: Re: [ET] STANDINGS TOPIC
Post by: XTO -- on March 02, 2012, 07:58:41 AM
You already have enough points to go for the Knockouts, so no, unecessary
Title: Re: [ET] STANDINGS TOPIC
Post by: Squeak on March 02, 2012, 08:01:51 AM
Group 2, dafuq
Btw thanks for making it, Ptrvy.
Title: Re: [ET] STANDINGS TOPIC
Post by: Shifftee on March 02, 2012, 01:51:07 PM
You already have enough points to go for the Knockouts, so no, unecessary
Okay. (:

And iAndy has no chance to get into knock-outs either?  :cc_detective:
Title: Re: [ET] STANDINGS TOPIC
Post by: Squeak on March 03, 2012, 06:35:09 AM
It will be like A1-B2, B1-A2?
Title: Re: [ET] STANDINGS TOPIC
Post by: MxZz. on March 03, 2012, 09:09:00 AM
It will be like A1-B2, B1-A2?
I hope it's A1 - D2 - B1 - C2... C:
Title: Re: [ET] STANDINGS TOPIC
Post by: Squeak on March 03, 2012, 10:20:39 AM
Then me against Dundee, hm.
Title: Re: [ET] STANDINGS TOPIC
Post by: XTO -- on March 03, 2012, 11:40:04 AM
Something like that
SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2024, SimplePortal