SUGGESTIONS & JUDGE CRITICISM

[Diaz]

And I assume you think the school is the only thing for me when it's schooltime. I play tennis 3-4 times a week, go out with friends, and yes, school will just turn harder and more serious next year. And summer vacations are not problem as you can ask for another date of your match...

[bLADE]

Don't see the problem with having more matches. All you have to do is copy paste challenges or think of new ones

[Art]

JL has about 30 challenges, thats enough for first round.

[JL]

it's gonna be over by the end of august, if not sonner.

[Art]

^i guess you're talking about first round. what about other?

[Tg]

Can the other matches be posted on Sunday or something? I don't want to no-show.

did you just threaten me with a no-show?

No sir!

[GDL]

Can someone lock the topics of the matches that finished. It'll be easier to keep up with the current ones.

[JL]

Can someone lock the topics of the matches that finished. It'll be easier to keep up with the current ones.

i'll lock them - but not immediatly... in case somebody (mostly judges) still want to loose some words about the stunts

and stuff

[Art]

also, edit the topic's names when closing to make it easier for everyone to check who has won and how many votes each had

[JL]

also, edit the topic's names when closing to make it easier for everyone to check who has won and how many votes each had

the winners are here: http://challonge.com/sasl2013gtas

i might add them to the title, but im not gonna count the votes

[Airbrush]

I'm just curious as I'm fairly new to these sort of things but how are stunts judged on? Are they judged on the style/look of the stunt or are they judged on the difficulty or whether or not a stunt is new or not?

For an example let's say the challenge is "land something higher than the bump" and one person lands SF bridge meanwhile someone lands something as small as that hedge bump in las venturas. But let's say that las venturas stunt is new, would they automatically win because it's new? Or would the SF bridge stunt be voted in because of how difficult it is in comparison?

I'm just curious as to how judges judge in this sort of thing. Do you go for creativity or do you go for difficulty?

Thanks in advance.

[JL]

Well actually, the judges have to consider atleast three elements on their voting:

1. interpretation of the objective
2. difficulty of the stunt / the dedication of the stunter
3. originality and creativity of the stunter

Those are the basic elements that i can think of. Somewhere between those, you can also add execution/looks of the stunt. However, all the judges have a different mindset about things and are certainly going to bring some of their personal preferences into the voting - which is very vital in my opinion.

If you want some more details, try looking up the judges votes on the matches that have already ended.

Hope i could answer your question.

[Airbrush]

Thanks it helped.

[PM]

I want you to post my match vs Paull earlier (asap), since we both don't want to wait one month. He agreed with it so if it is possible, please do it. Thanks.

[Paull]

I want you to post my match vs Paull earlier (asap), since we both don't want to wait one month. He agreed with it so if it is possible, please do it. Thanks.