0:07 -
0:17 -
0:25 -
0:34 -
0:45 -
0:55 -
1:06 -
1:16 -
1:29 -
1:40 -
1:46 -
1:53 -
2:05 -
2:16 -
2:32 -
2:40 -
2:48 -
2:58 -
[/spoiler_block]The opener, the electric tower landing and those pole boost stunts were brilliant, this is probably my favorite taxi-only stunt video, I'm truly amazed!Pretty much what i was gonnq say.... love it :wub:
it was ok, 1:55 was awesome. Why didnt you put any effort into this?Stop being such a negative dick, this vid was great.
Its 2016.it was ok, 1:55 was awesome. Why didnt you put any effort into this?Stop being such a negative dick, this vid was great.
Also liked that all stunts were done without rollboostsYou wouldn't even spot the difference in 90% of the stunts in this video, if not in every stunt shown here. There isn't a solid difference in the height you can get apart from rolling being more consistent when it comes to supplying inputs when the game can handle them.
Also liked that all stunts were done without rollboostsYou wouldn't even spot the difference in 90% of the stunts in this video, if not in every stunt shown here. There isn't a solid difference in the height you can get apart from rolling being more consistent when it comes to supplying inputs when the game can handle them.
I don't understand fully what do you mean, but i know that for stunts like Xtramus did, you can use button or mswheel and there is no difference in the height. When i wrote my post, i more had in mind that it's more interesting to see those boosts, compared to simple high rollboosts to roof for example..Also liked that all stunts were done without rollboostsYou wouldn't even spot the difference in 90% of the stunts in this video, if not in every stunt shown here. There isn't a solid difference in the height you can get apart from rolling being more consistent when it comes to supplying inputs when the game can handle them.
Of course most of them are far more interesting than simple high roofs, but jumping down from a roof onto a burger falls in the same boring category for me. I really enjoyed this video, don't mistake my words, but all these rollboost claims left, right and center annoy me. RedX has been using normal button mashing boosting since forever and has gotten massive height off of really tiny walls. I could show you lots of stunts and you wouldn't be able to tell if they had been done using rollboosting or doing it the regular way. That includes simple high roofs. I rarely ever land a 'big' roof unless the boost to get there is somewhat stylish, but even on my 50ft boost2precs people give me shit for using my mouse when it makes absolutely no difference at all. I'm not magically going to fly up 1000ft, this is not SA. You could've just said that you liked the video because it was not focused on just landing high places but instead you took a dump on people's effort without knowing you're wrong.I don't understand fully what do you mean, but i know that for stunts like Xtramus did, you can use button or mswheel and there is no difference in the height. When i wrote my post, i more had in mind that it's more interesting to see those boosts, compared to simple high rollboosts to roof for example..Also liked that all stunts were done without rollboostsYou wouldn't even spot the difference in 90% of the stunts in this video, if not in every stunt shown here. There isn't a solid difference in the height you can get apart from rolling being more consistent when it comes to supplying inputs when the game can handle them.
Yeah, i could say like this, my bad (it's because of my bad english). But please don't think that i hate rollboosting, i don't care if stunt was landed with button or mouse wheel, i more rate the idea and execution of the stunt. I wrote not correctly in my first post, i'm sorry.Of course most of them are far more interesting than simple high roofs, but jumping down from a roof onto a burger falls in the same boring category for me. I really enjoyed this video, don't mistake my words, but all these rollboost claims left, right and center annoy me. RedX has been using normal button mashing boosting since forever and has gotten massive height off of really tiny walls. I could show you lots of stunts and you wouldn't be able to tell if they had been done using rollboosting or doing it the regular way. That includes simple high roofs. I rarely ever land a 'big' roof unless the boost to get there is somewhat stylish, but even on my 50ft boost2precs people give me shit for using my mouse when it makes absolutely no difference at all. I'm not magically going to fly up 1000ft, this is not SA. You could've just said that you liked the video because it was not focused on just landing high places but instead you took a dump on people's effort without knowing you're wrong.I don't understand fully what do you mean, but i know that for stunts like Xtramus did, you can use button or mswheel and there is no difference in the height. When i wrote my post, i more had in mind that it's more interesting to see those boosts, compared to simple high rollboosts to roof for example..Also liked that all stunts were done without rollboostsYou wouldn't even spot the difference in 90% of the stunts in this video, if not in every stunt shown here. There isn't a solid difference in the height you can get apart from rolling being more consistent when it comes to supplying inputs when the game can handle them.
Its 2016.Now Its 2017.