Author Topic: SASL4  (Read 11514 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline SnowMan

  • Veteran Member
  • Posts: 7125
  • Life is what you make it
    • View Profile
Re: SASL4
« Reply #15 on: August 05, 2010, 09:55:12 AM »
@SM ... KM won the first two, Dan won the third one

I know about the first 2 but totally forgot the r69 vs dan.

What about a "smaller"-Team league? just like 2-3 guys in one team, would work better i guess...

Offline Rusch69

  • Senior Member
  • Posts: 2990
    • View Profile
Re: SASL4
« Reply #16 on: August 05, 2010, 11:05:03 AM »
I didn't really follow the VC one which failed aswell as I hear. The SA one was too screwed with the member trading and the teams seriously were too big + inactive partly. Randomly throwing a few guys together would be the first option. Would be cool though if people can form a group and sign up then. Like 3 guys in each team, so in a match the team which wins 2/3 challenges goes ahead.

Offline PrzemOO

  • Veteran Member
  • Posts: 2429
    • View Profile
Re: SASL4
« Reply #17 on: August 05, 2010, 11:13:34 AM »
I didn't really follow the VC one which failed aswell as I hear. The SA one was too screwed with the member trading and the teams seriously were too big + inactive partly. Randomly throwing a few guys together would be the first option. Would be cool though if people can form a group and sign up then. Like 3 guys in each team, so in a match the team which wins 2/3 challenges goes ahead.


I like that, i wish it could come true  :euro:

Offline KillaMarci

  • <3
  • Veteran Member
  • Posts: 8700
  • Don't you remember the monsters?
    • View Profile
Re: SASL4
« Reply #18 on: August 05, 2010, 11:31:41 AM »
I'd like a 2vs2 mechanism actually :P 3vs3 would be too big already IMO.
Because if two of them don't show up, then one of them has to land 3 challenges. With 2 people teams he would only have to do two.

Offline Artifex

  • Artifex
  • Veteran Member
  • Posts: 3332
    • View Profile
Re: SASL4
« Reply #19 on: August 05, 2010, 12:05:48 PM »
I'd like a 2vs2 mechanism actually :P 3vs3 would be too big already IMO.
Because if two of them don't show up, then one of them has to land 3 challenges. With 2 people teams he would only have to do two.
THIS and you should pick youre team mate C:

Offline puzzLe

  • Veteran Member
  • Posts: 6480
  • Wasteland Heroes
    • View Profile
Re: SASL4
« Reply #20 on: August 05, 2010, 12:11:42 PM »
I would like to participate

Offline PtRvY

  • WH Crew
  • Veteran Member
  • Posts: 4153
  • Wasteland Hero / BT Member
    • View Profile
Re: SASL4
« Reply #21 on: August 05, 2010, 12:44:24 PM »
I'd like a 2vs2 mechanism actually :P 3vs3 would be too big already IMO.
Because if two of them don't show up, then one of them has to land 3 challenges. With 2 people teams he would only have to do two.
THIS and you should pick youre team mate C:
Yep, it should totally be organized like that. Random draws ftl.

Offline Rusch69

  • Senior Member
  • Posts: 2990
    • View Profile
Re: SASL4
« Reply #22 on: August 05, 2010, 12:52:45 PM »
Because if two of them don't show up, then one of them has to land 3 challenges. With 2 people teams he would only have to do two.

In this case, it'd show that the team actually just failed. You're supposed to do your entry TOGETHER People should pick trustful guys as their team mates.

One guy doing a whole entry with 3 stunts is like a single SASL (semi) finals match already and way too much. 3 per team is a good middle imo which binds you really together, cuz its obviously that you would need a fucking lot of luck to come up with 3 really decent stunts alone in a time period which was supposed for 3 guys and 3 stunts.

Also you could set a maximum of stunts per stunter. 1 stunter just can make max 2 stunts of the entry which includes 3 stunts. So you can also come through when one really is not available or smth.

When your team mate hasn't time he is supposed to ask for a match shift or extension when it already runs.

And when it'd be 2 vs 2, draws could happen. Rematches suck and always just delay the whole league.



Hope you get my points. :lol:
« Last Edit: August 05, 2010, 12:56:21 PM by Rusch69 »

Offline MeetMyMeat

  • Veteran Member
  • Posts: 4310
  • Enough video games guys
    • View Profile
Re: SASL4
« Reply #23 on: August 05, 2010, 01:22:57 PM »
3v3 sounds nice. I'll be willing to participate if it comes true. All else that is needed are /competent/ judges for a change who actually stunt in SA.

Offline Sear

  • Veteran Member
  • Posts: 2803
    • View Profile
Re: SASL4
« Reply #24 on: August 06, 2010, 12:05:34 AM »
The third league was an epic fail since not everyone could even participate in it.

Offline Squeak

  • Forbidden Element
  • Veteran Member
  • Posts: 2949
    • View Profile
Re: SASL4
« Reply #25 on: August 06, 2010, 05:16:20 AM »
3v3 is cool, especially with occasionally chosen teammates :)

Offline varial

  • Veteran Member
  • Posts: 2034
    • View Profile
Re: SASL4
« Reply #26 on: August 06, 2010, 12:30:53 PM »
yea really nice
teams with really skilled guys against guys who are less skilled

Offline Genyus

  • Veteran Member
  • Posts: 6149
    • View Profile
Re: SASL4
« Reply #27 on: August 06, 2010, 12:53:57 PM »
Chosen teammates is a horrible idea. I can already see something like KM, Stevex and fill in random WH-member kicking everyones ass. No thanks, I'd rather have random draws.

Btw, I would participate in a 2v2 or 3v3 league, sounds fun. But I'm also willing to judge if there will be retarded judges again.

Offline Squeak

  • Forbidden Element
  • Veteran Member
  • Posts: 2949
    • View Profile
Re: SASL4
« Reply #28 on: August 06, 2010, 02:15:16 PM »
Chosen teammates is a horrible idea. I can already see something like KM, Stevex and fill in random WH-member kicking everyones ass. No thanks, I'd rather have random draws.

Btw, I would participate in a 2v2 or 3v3 league, sounds fun. But I'm also willing to judge if there will be retarded judges again.
3v3 is cool, especially with occasionally chosen teammates
= u cant choose your teammate, but judges will



oh i know, everybody will talk with judges to choose those who want to be with, right? :|

Offline SnowMan

  • Veteran Member
  • Posts: 7125
  • Life is what you make it
    • View Profile
Re: SASL4
« Reply #29 on: August 06, 2010, 04:04:11 PM »
first there should be one organizer.

 

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2024, SimplePortal