Author Topic: fb kizen remake  (Read 895 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline The Big V

Re: 60 Seconds Chrono - Unknown Artist
« Reply #15 on: August 18, 2019, 10:22:11 PM »
Pretty cool remake guys. Enjoyed the soundtrack too  :a-cheer:

Offline SoLoD

Re: 60 Seconds Chrono - Unknown Artist
« Reply #16 on: August 19, 2019, 07:29:18 AM »
Ouch! First you insult anime songs on Burn's stream, now this transition to my personlity that has nothing to do with this video.
This transition is nothing important, but under one of my videos there is an interesting comment saying, and i quote "feels like some of those Art's solos, but unmodded". I do not thing that you are a modder. I saw your videos and i like them. Actually, i even try to reland some of the stunts. I even do not think that quote is all about your stunts and NOT your behavior as GTAS member. In other circumstances i would love to take that quote as compliment (if it was serious). But you must admit that this quote, your quote about me and quality of this "remake" allows me to say: OH THE IRONY.
But if "transition" is just a funny thing, insulting an anime songs is a serious shit and can not be ignored. That is why i must step forward and make another post insulting something related to you. So, why dont i make a UNBIASED review to your "remake" since the quality of it allows me to do it? Unbised answer to your biased insulting to anime songs.

First of all, why do people make a remakes. People do not make a remake of some random video. This video must be classic/popular/legendary/favorite. They make a remake to show respect to that video, stunters and influence that video made years and years ago.
You chose FB Kizen. In the description you posted what a Kaizen means. And Kaizen means to do your best, right? So, you say people can expect a really good remake. But what is the first thing people see? That you threw work UNFINISHED. You call that "outro stunts"? But if you will look at old SA stunting videos, you will see, that "outro stunts" are part of a stunting videos with the same quality (or sometimes even higher) OR they are just bails. In Kizen they were not bails. They were a part of the stunting video. So, you just threw your work on a half way. And i am asking - is it some irony or what people call today "postirony"? Or is it your own interpretation what Kaizen principles mean?

Now, let's make it easily to understand. Let's look at a good remake video, PM's TSM S,D&R'n'R remake. Obviously you can not do it way better than original (only some small things), but also you should not make it worse than original. Because, what is the point? What is the point to take 11 years old video and make it worse than original? You say those stunts were landed/executed "okay"? They were not. Maybe you think i bother you with some irrelevant details? Because i do not. I see 3 experienced skilled stunters, i know what they are capable for. And when i see those "executions" on a pretty easy stunts, when i see "prec landings" where part of vehicle hanging in the air instead of making a normal solid landing (and this is the point of prec landing stunts btw), i know those stunters just did not put enough effort. They did not put 10 more minutes to do things properly.
And that "missed" stunt now looks like not a "miss", but like a regularity. Lack of effort's regularity. So, do you think you've done enough?

Now, you did not land those "outro stunt". But not just that. You did not make an OUTRO. So, your video is just a STUMP. It feels like you threw stunts to Vegas, rendered and now throw "something mixed" to our faces: "Go, watch". Video must be a finished product. After all, where is simple "thanks for watching"? Special thanks? Where is explanation what we just watched, why it was made? Intro, main part, outro. Do you think it is a niggle? But we are talking about respect. Remake to show respect. And your "product" has nothing to do with respect. Even this fucking title of this thread, why do you put there a song from an outro of original video if you decided to ignore it in your "remake"?

So, this is not PM's type of remake. Maybe it is a BlackTear's type of remake (WH Megaton, btw it has no intro/outro too)? Maybe it is a joke/irony/postorny? When i saw PM's remake - i said "WOW", when i saw BlackTear's remake - i said "LOL". Tell me, what do i need to say when i look at your "product"?

First impression of this video was: damn, this editor lasted, like, 30 seconds. Editing, stunting, feels like you made it "on exhale". And now i remember what you said on Burn's stream. You said that you can make like 10 attempts per 1 stunt and then you move to another one. I assume this video was made in the same direction. This is not a good stunting video. This is not a good remake of a good stunting video. You have made a monument to your own unwillingness to stunting. Tell us, how does it feel when you need to search for a reasons every time you open SA? Is it worth it?

Offline STREEM

Re: 60 Seconds Chrono - Unknown Artist
« Reply #17 on: August 19, 2019, 07:34:09 AM »
who is this weeb ?

had a good laugh reading this though
« Last Edit: August 19, 2019, 07:36:06 AM by STREEM »

Offline Art

Re: 60 Seconds Chrono - Unknown Artist
« Reply #18 on: August 19, 2019, 07:34:18 AM »
someone screencap this

Offline Minq

Re: 60 Seconds Chrono - Unknown Artist
« Reply #19 on: August 19, 2019, 11:49:07 AM »
 ★  ★ ☾ ☆ .  ★  :.  . ○ ★  .  * . .   .    . * ● . ...somewhere    ☾  . ● .  ★  :.  .   .  * :. .in a parallel universe* ●      ☾ ☆  . * .   ★ ★ . .    . ☾ ☆  . * ● ..some guys... ☾ ★ ● .   ★  :.  . ○ ★  .  *aren't  salty ☾ ★ ● .

Offline Jomra

Re: 60 Seconds Chrono - Unknown Artist
« Reply #20 on: August 19, 2019, 12:13:34 PM »
Ouch! First you insult anime songs on Burn's stream, now this transition to my personlity that has nothing to do with this video.
This transition is nothing important, but under one of my videos there is an interesting comment saying, and i quote "feels like some of those Art's solos, but unmodded". I do not thing that you are a modder. I saw your videos and i like them. Actually, i even try to reland some of the stunts. I even do not think that quote is all about your stunts and NOT your behavior as GTAS member. In other circumstances i would love to take that quote as compliment (if it was serious). But you must admit that this quote, your quote about me and quality of this "remake" allows me to say: OH THE IRONY.
But if "transition" is just a funny thing, insulting an anime songs is a serious shit and can not be ignored. That is why i must step forward and make another post insulting something related to you. So, why dont i make a UNBIASED review to your "remake" since the quality of it allows me to do it? Unbised answer to your biased insulting to anime songs.

First of all, why do people make a remakes. People do not make a remake of some random video. This video must be classic/popular/legendary/favorite. They make a remake to show respect to that video, stunters and influence that video made years and years ago.
You chose FB Kizen. In the description you posted what a Kaizen means. And Kaizen means to do your best, right? So, you say people can expect a really good remake. But what is the first thing people see? That you threw work UNFINISHED. You call that "outro stunts"? But if you will look at old SA stunting videos, you will see, that "outro stunts" are part of a stunting videos with the same quality (or sometimes even higher) OR they are just bails. In Kizen they were not bails. They were a part of the stunting video. So, you just threw your work on a half way. And i am asking - is it some irony or what people call today "postirony"? Or is it your own interpretation what Kaizen principles mean?

Now, let's make it easily to understand. Let's look at a good remake video, PM's TSM S,D&R'n'R remake. Obviously you can not do it way better than original (only some small things), but also you should not make it worse than original. Because, what is the point? What is the point to take 11 years old video and make it worse than original? You say those stunts were landed/executed "okay"? They were not. Maybe you think i bother you with some irrelevant details? Because i do not. I see 3 experienced skilled stunters, i know what they are capable for. And when i see those "executions" on a pretty easy stunts, when i see "prec landings" where part of vehicle hanging in the air instead of making a normal solid landing (and this is the point of prec landing stunts btw), i know those stunters just did not put enough effort. They did not put 10 more minutes to do things properly.
And that "missed" stunt now looks like not a "miss", but like a regularity. Lack of effort's regularity. So, do you think you've done enough?

Now, you did not land those "outro stunt". But not just that. You did not make an OUTRO. So, your video is just a STUMP. It feels like you threw stunts to Vegas, rendered and now throw "something mixed" to our faces: "Go, watch". Video must be a finished product. After all, where is simple "thanks for watching"? Special thanks? Where is explanation what we just watched, why it was made? Intro, main part, outro. Do you think it is a niggle? But we are talking about respect. Remake to show respect. And your "product" has nothing to do with respect. Even this fucking title of this thread, why do you put there a song from an outro of original video if you decided to ignore it in your "remake"?

So, this is not PM's type of remake. Maybe it is a BlackTear's type of remake (WH Megaton, btw it has no intro/outro too)? Maybe it is a joke/irony/postorny? When i saw PM's remake - i said "WOW", when i saw BlackTear's remake - i said "LOL". Tell me, what do i need to say when i look at your "product"?

First impression of this video was: damn, this editor lasted, like, 30 seconds. Editing, stunting, feels like you made it "on exhale". And now i remember what you said on Burn's stream. You said that you can make like 10 attempts per 1 stunt and then you move to another one. I assume this video was made in the same direction. This is not a good stunting video. This is not a good remake of a good stunting video. You have made a monument to your own unwillingness to stunting. Tell us, how does it feel when you need to search for a reasons every time you open SA? Is it worth it?
https://youtu.be/deprYLSGojM

Offline Blaze

Re: 60 Seconds Chrono - Unknown Artist
« Reply #21 on: August 21, 2019, 03:13:37 AM »
Ouch! First you insult anime songs on Burn's stream, now this transition to my personlity that has nothing to do with this video.
This transition is nothing important, but under one of my videos there is an interesting comment saying, and i quote "feels like some of those Art's solos, but unmodded". I do not thing that you are a modder. I saw your videos and i like them. Actually, i even try to reland some of the stunts. I even do not think that quote is all about your stunts and NOT your behavior as GTAS member. In other circumstances i would love to take that quote as compliment (if it was serious). But you must admit that this quote, your quote about me and quality of this "remake" allows me to say: OH THE IRONY.
But if "transition" is just a funny thing, insulting an anime songs is a serious shit and can not be ignored. That is why i must step forward and make another post insulting something related to you. So, why dont i make a UNBIASED review to your "remake" since the quality of it allows me to do it? Unbised answer to your biased insulting to anime songs.

First of all, why do people make a remakes. People do not make a remake of some random video. This video must be classic/popular/legendary/favorite. They make a remake to show respect to that video, stunters and influence that video made years and years ago.
You chose FB Kizen. In the description you posted what a Kaizen means. And Kaizen means to do your best, right? So, you say people can expect a really good remake. But what is the first thing people see? That you threw work UNFINISHED. You call that "outro stunts"? But if you will look at old SA stunting videos, you will see, that "outro stunts" are part of a stunting videos with the same quality (or sometimes even higher) OR they are just bails. In Kizen they were not bails. They were a part of the stunting video. So, you just threw your work on a half way. And i am asking - is it some irony or what people call today "postirony"? Or is it your own interpretation what Kaizen principles mean?

Now, let's make it easily to understand. Let's look at a good remake video, PM's TSM S,D&R'n'R remake. Obviously you can not do it way better than original (only some small things), but also you should not make it worse than original. Because, what is the point? What is the point to take 11 years old video and make it worse than original? You say those stunts were landed/executed "okay"? They were not. Maybe you think i bother you with some irrelevant details? Because i do not. I see 3 experienced skilled stunters, i know what they are capable for. And when i see those "executions" on a pretty easy stunts, when i see "prec landings" where part of vehicle hanging in the air instead of making a normal solid landing (and this is the point of prec landing stunts btw), i know those stunters just did not put enough effort. They did not put 10 more minutes to do things properly.
And that "missed" stunt now looks like not a "miss", but like a regularity. Lack of effort's regularity. So, do you think you've done enough?

Now, you did not land those "outro stunt". But not just that. You did not make an OUTRO. So, your video is just a STUMP. It feels like you threw stunts to Vegas, rendered and now throw "something mixed" to our faces: "Go, watch". Video must be a finished product. After all, where is simple "thanks for watching"? Special thanks? Where is explanation what we just watched, why it was made? Intro, main part, outro. Do you think it is a niggle? But we are talking about respect. Remake to show respect. And your "product" has nothing to do with respect. Even this fucking title of this thread, why do you put there a song from an outro of original video if you decided to ignore it in your "remake"?

So, this is not PM's type of remake. Maybe it is a BlackTear's type of remake (WH Megaton, btw it has no intro/outro too)? Maybe it is a joke/irony/postorny? When i saw PM's remake - i said "WOW", when i saw BlackTear's remake - i said "LOL". Tell me, what do i need to say when i look at your "product"?

First impression of this video was: damn, this editor lasted, like, 30 seconds. Editing, stunting, feels like you made it "on exhale". And now i remember what you said on Burn's stream. You said that you can make like 10 attempts per 1 stunt and then you move to another one. I assume this video was made in the same direction. This is not a good stunting video. This is not a good remake of a good stunting video. You have made a monument to your own unwillingness to stunting. Tell us, how does it feel when you need to search for a reasons every time you open SA? Is it worth it?

imagine being this upset because someone talked shit on a fucking anime song