Author Topic: [ET] STANDINGS TOPIC  (Read 4496 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline PtRvY

  • WH Crew
  • Veteran Member
  • Posts: 4153
  • Wasteland Hero / BT Member
    • View Profile
[ET] STANDINGS TOPIC
« on: February 24, 2012, 01:26:31 PM »
XTO gave me permission to make these (I offered to do it since I have experience from two previous group system tournaments), hopefully it should help with any group system related confusion you guys might have! Got all the info from him so these are not my remarks, all I did was make the GFX :P

I'll update these periodically.

Remarks:
- A no-show win is counted as 3-0.
- In the match D4rksh4doW vs. eXe, D4rksh4doW was awarded a 6-0 win because eXe didn't fulfill the challenge.
- Some matches marked as won are not actually wins yet, this is due to the fact the vote count of the leading editor is less than 4. Judges are asked to timely correct this error.
- All judges are kindly requested to make the vote count in every topic on it maximum (6), so that we have a fair base for PD (Point Difference) ranking. Two editors with the same amount of points won will be ranked using this value.

W - Wins
D - Draws
L - Losses
PD - Point Difference (Amount of votes for minus amount of votes against the editor)
Pts - Points won

San Andreas

















Vice City









I hope you guys find this helpful. :)
« Last Edit: March 01, 2012, 08:09:33 PM by PtRvY »

Offline XTO --

  • Board Mods
  • Posts: 4333
  • HUEHUEHEU
    • View Profile
Re: [ET] STANDINGS TOPIC
« Reply #1 on: February 24, 2012, 01:30:31 PM »
Thanks for doing this Petar :wub:

Preparing round 3 stuff, they should be up in 4 and half hours or  bit more ^^

Offline value

  • internationaler player
  • Posts: 595
  • thabang
    • View Profile
    • YOUTUBE
Re: [ET] STANDINGS TOPIC
« Reply #2 on: February 24, 2012, 01:44:29 PM »
ich zieh die punkte wie yayo lines auf gran canaria


gj and ty for doing this stuff

Offline Rainbow

  • Senior Member
  • Posts: 7374
  • Coeur de taxi
    • View Profile
    • http://www.youtube.com/Rainbowstunting
Re: [ET] STANDINGS TOPIC
« Reply #3 on: February 24, 2012, 02:25:07 PM »
I won from Determined in VC yet I have 0 points.. Explaination?  :cheersad:

Offline XTO --

  • Board Mods
  • Posts: 4333
  • HUEHUEHEU
    • View Profile
Re: [ET] STANDINGS TOPIC
« Reply #4 on: February 24, 2012, 02:33:29 PM »
There was 1 judge who didn't vote in that match. ByTe is working on it to get the maximum possible votes, sorry for that. I got to work in the vote system after the second round started, and Petar gave me some tips, so your first match, Helios first match and a couple of others may have to get their 6th vote, since it's like 3-2 nor 4-1.

Offline PtRvY

  • WH Crew
  • Veteran Member
  • Posts: 4153
  • Wasteland Hero / BT Member
    • View Profile
Re: [ET] STANDINGS TOPIC
« Reply #5 on: February 24, 2012, 02:34:42 PM »
I won from Determined in VC yet I have 0 points.. Explaination?  :cheersad:

You need 4 points in a match to win. XtO marked you as a winner by checking who had more votes but didn't see that the score was 3-2. When ByTe votes we'll know whether you've truly won or it was a tie. :P

Offline Squeak

  • Forbidden Element
  • Veteran Member
  • Posts: 2949
    • View Profile
Re: [ET] STANDINGS TOPIC
« Reply #6 on: February 24, 2012, 02:45:14 PM »
What is the point of making those PDs while in some matches all the judges didn't even vote at all.

Offline XTO --

  • Board Mods
  • Posts: 4333
  • HUEHUEHEU
    • View Profile
Re: [ET] STANDINGS TOPIC
« Reply #7 on: February 24, 2012, 02:48:10 PM »
The main issue with the previous vote system, is that there was a rather small, but existing possibility that there was a major tie in the end of the third round. But I actually started thinking about that after the beggining of the second one, after I have already declared you as the match winner. Gladly Petar told me what he have done in the previous tour to avoid that, since I haven't come up with any solutions by then, now we have it, and maybe a not really good one for a very few participants.

Even tho I believe it wouldn't happen, it's better to avoid that kind of situation


@Squeak: ByTe is voting in every match that didn't have 6 votes to make sure it's all good


Also, Rainbow, why didn't you show-up?
« Last Edit: February 24, 2012, 03:09:11 PM by XTO »

Offline disciplo

  • Veteran Member
  • Posts: 905
    • View Profile
Re: [ET] STANDINGS TOPIC
« Reply #8 on: February 24, 2012, 03:58:46 PM »
so I guess that even if I win cloudwalker, it will be a meaningless victory since I won't have enough points to go for the other round? or maybe I'm misunderstanding this?

Offline XTO --

  • Board Mods
  • Posts: 4333
  • HUEHUEHEU
    • View Profile
Re: [ET] STANDINGS TOPIC
« Reply #9 on: February 24, 2012, 04:00:20 PM »
Top 2 will go for knockouts, not only the first place. So yes, you have a chance

Offline Rainbow

  • Senior Member
  • Posts: 7374
  • Coeur de taxi
    • View Profile
    • http://www.youtube.com/Rainbowstunting
Re: [ET] STANDINGS TOPIC
« Reply #10 on: February 25, 2012, 03:55:10 AM »
Sign me out of this league in VC aswell. How did we freaking tie a round? An even number of judges? The challenge was best camera angles and this is how Warow voted:

Rainbow: Nice camera's.
Determined: Camera's weren't so amazing.

Voting for Determined ...

cya guys have fun in the league it's the same crap all over again.

Offline Determined

  • Pro Coral Collector
  • Veteran Member
  • Posts: 5193
  • Pridestalker
    • View Profile
    • Determined's YT Acc
Re: [ET] STANDINGS TOPIC
« Reply #11 on: February 25, 2012, 08:44:54 AM »
Actually, the objective was best editing with 2 cinematic angles, there was no implication that the actual angles would play a major part.

Offline Rainbow

  • Senior Member
  • Posts: 7374
  • Coeur de taxi
    • View Profile
    • http://www.youtube.com/Rainbowstunting
Re: [ET] STANDINGS TOPIC
« Reply #12 on: February 26, 2012, 07:24:48 AM »
Actually, the objective was best editing with 2 cinematic angles, there was no implication that the actual angles would play a major part.


Where does this say editing???


Objective: Best camera angles where you must use atleast 2 cinematic angles

Offline Determined

  • Pro Coral Collector
  • Veteran Member
  • Posts: 5193
  • Pridestalker
    • View Profile
    • Determined's YT Acc
Re: [ET] STANDINGS TOPIC
« Reply #13 on: February 26, 2012, 01:41:49 PM »
Sorry, my bad, thought it said editing  :lol:
In that case, you're right.

Offline PtRvY

  • WH Crew
  • Veteran Member
  • Posts: 4153
  • Wasteland Hero / BT Member
    • View Profile
Re: [ET] STANDINGS TOPIC
« Reply #14 on: March 01, 2012, 08:09:59 PM »
Final update. Now that we know everyone who passed. :) Good that there weren't any ties, that made my job hella easier :D

I'd like to congratulate D4rksh4doW and Kacknase for their flawless scores in SA and VC :)
« Last Edit: March 01, 2012, 08:26:38 PM by PtRvY »

 

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2024, SimplePortal